4 Penn State players reach double figures in win over Fordham |

4 Penn State players reach double figures in win over Fordham

UNIVERSITY PARK — D.J. Newbill led four players in double figures with 18 points and dished out five assists as the Penn State rolled over visiting Fordham, 73-54, on Sunday at Bryce Jordan Center.

Freshman Shep Garner went 4 for 8 from 3-point range to score 12 points, and Brandon Taylor added 11 for Penn State (2-0), which forced 17 turnovers. John Johnson came off the bench to contribute 11 points, and Ross Travis chipped in with eight points and nine rebounds for the Nittany Lions.

Eric Paschall, who scored 31 in his collegiate debut for Fordham on Friday, went 3 for 10 from the field for seven points before fouling out with 12:56 left. Nemanja Zarkovic scored 14, and Christian Sengfelder added 10 to lead the Rams (1-1), who produced 94 points in their season opener.

Fordham led by five early in the first half before Taylor made a 3-pointer and a layup to ignite a 19-1 run that was capped by Newbill’s dunk.

Newbill led the way with 10 points in the opening 20 minutes, including a basket, a steal and an assist in the final 1:04 as Penn State increased its lead to 38-21 at intermission.

Travis started the second half with three straight baskets, highlighted by a dunk, to push the lead to 23 for the Nittany Lions.

Zarkovic drained a 3-pointer to bring the Rams within 57-38 with a little more than 10 minutes left. But Garner answered with a basket from beyond the arc, and Taylor hit a jumper as Penn State halted the rally.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.