Good sign for Penn State? The last regular-season Friday game led to a national championship |

Good sign for Penn State? The last regular-season Friday game led to a national championship

Penn State head coach James Franklin, steps off the the bus as the team arrives to take on Kent State in State College, Pa., Saturday, Sept. 15, 2018.

Penn State ‘s James Franklin is no fan of Friday-night college football, having called it partly a product of “greed.” But the coach might like this: The last time Penn State played a regular-season game on a Friday, it won the national championship.

Penn State opens the Big Ten Conference schedule at Illinois, where it will play its first regular-season Friday game in 36 years. The Lions last played on Friday in 1982, when they defeated Pitt 19-10 on the day after Thanksgiving. Penn State capped that season by defeating Georgia in the Sugar Bowl for its first national championship.

Though he can point to that historic legacy of Friday football, Franklin has made clear how much he dislikes this game. From altering his team’s weekly schedule to infringing on high-school football’s traditional night, Franklin doesn’t have much good to say about playing on Fridays.

In fact, the Penn State coach cited “greed” as a factor in leagues — whether college or the NFL — scheduling games outside their traditional days.

Franklin has called himself a traditionalist who prefers the football model he grew up with: high schools on Friday, colleges on Saturday, NFL on Sunday. But as some of the smaller college conferences began marketing games on weeknights, Franklin said that some of the bigger conferences began chasing that revenue as well.

The Big Ten began scheduling regular-season weeknight games in 2017, kicking off last season with Ohio State vs. Indiana on a Thursday. Penn State has agreed to play an occasional Friday-night road game but said it would not host one at Beaver Stadium.

Penn State has said it would be willing to host a day game on the Friday after Thanksgiving.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.