ShareThis Page
Penn State coach James Franklin addresses USC speculation |

Penn State coach James Franklin addresses USC speculation

| Tuesday, November 20, 2018 8:45 p.m
Penn State coach James Franklin (right) shakes hands with Rutgers coach Chris Ash on Saturday, Nov. 17, 2018, in Piscataway, N.J. Penn State won 20-7.

Penn State coach James Franklin addressed speculation Tuesday about whether he’d be a candidate for the job at Southern Cal should the university part ways with Clay Helton after three seasons.

While not saying if he’d be interested in the Trojans’ coaching position, Franklin said it was “that time of year where all this stuff happens.”

“It’s the crazy, mad time of year where these types of things happen,” he said at his weekly teleconference before the Nittany Lions’ final regular-season game against Maryland.

“As you (reporters) know, like always, we’re focused on Maryland completely, 100 percent. I don’t think it’s even fair or right to even be talking about that job from everything I understand about it. But we’re completely focused on Maryland.”

Franklin has been identified by various national media outlets as a candidate for the USC job. He is 44-20 in his fifth season at Penn State. The Nittany Lions can finish with their third straight 10-win season if they defeat Maryland and go on to win a bowl game.

Franklin signed a contract extension before the 2017 season that runs through 2022. He is making $5.65 million this season. Under terms of the contract, he would owe the university $1 million should he leave for another college job.

Helton became interim head coach at USC midway through the 2015 season after Steve Sarkisian took a leave of absence. He was named permanent coach for the final two games of that season. His career record is 32-16, but the Trojans are 5-6 this season and need a win Saturday over Notre Dame to become bowl eligible.

Categories: PennState
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.