Penn State comfortable playing on road this season |

Penn State comfortable playing on road this season

Getty Images
Penn State’s Christian Hackenberg looks to a pass Sept. 13, 2014, at High Point Solutions Stadium in Piscataway, N.J. The Nittany Lions have won four of their past five road games.

Before heading to Wisconsin for the 2013 season finale as the biggest underdog in school history, Penn State had gone almost 13 months between road wins.

Since pulling the upset in Madison, Wisc. as a 24-point underdog last Nov. 30, the Nittany Lions have changed their fortunes away from Beaver Stadium.

Penn State (6-4, 2-4) has won four of its past five away from home, dating to last season, heading into its road finale Saturday at Illinois (4-6, 1-5).

“When we’re on the road, we just go in thinking it’s an … us-against-the-world kind of thing,” receiver DaeSean Hamilton said. “We go in there knowing what the task is with the right mindset of we’re not really worried about crowd noise or anything like that.

“We just go in there and treat (it) like it’s just like another football game for us, an opportunity to get what we want. We just go in there and try to play our game.”

PSU’s stretch of four wins in five games away from home includes a victory over Central Florida in Dublin. In addition to winning at a hostile environment at Camp Randall Stadium in Wisconsin almost a year ago, the Lions also have won Big Ten games at Rutgers and Indiana this season. The Scarlet Knights’ home crowd was the largest in school history for their inaugural Big Ten contest against PSU on Sept. 13.

Penn State’s lone road defeat since losing at Minnesota on Nov. 9, 2013, is at Michigan last month.

“I think the biggest thing that you’re trying to do is deal with not having the homefield advantage with the noise and things like that,” Lions coach James Franklin said.

The environment at Memorial Stadium in Champaign, Ill., won’t be nearly as imposing as PSU games over the past two-plus years at Michigan, Ohio State or Nebraska. The Illini’s average home attendance of 42,612 is 11th in the 14-team Big Ten and is less than half that of the aforementioned schools or PSU’s home crowds at Beaver Stadium.

Despite upsetting then-ranked Minnesota, 28-24, at home four weeks ago, Illinois has lost 13 of its past 14 homes games against Big Ten teams. Illinois hasn’t beaten Penn State at Memorial Stadium since the Rashard Mendenhall-led Illini beat the Lions in 2007.

That year also marks the previous time both Illinois, which will be hosting Senior Day festivities Saturday, had a winning conference home record, and Penn State was under .500 on the road in the Big Ten.

Penn State’s dominant defense has been even better away from Beaver Stadium than it is has been in Happy Valley. The Lions’ lead FBS in yardage allowed in road or neutral-site games (254.3 per game).

Franklin said Wednesday there’s no secret or common thread to his team’s road success this season.

“I think it’s a coincidence, I think it’s opponents, I think it’s a lot of different things that factor in,” Franklin said. “I think it’s the people we’ve played at home, it’s the people we’ve played on the road, there’s a lot of factors that go into it.

“We want to be a really good road team, but we want to be a better home team, too.”

Chris Adamski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.