ShareThis Page
Penn State defensive tackle Givens’ raw talent on display during drills |

Penn State defensive tackle Givens’ raw talent on display during drills

Rick Wills
| Wednesday, March 23, 2016 8:48 p.m
Barry Reeger | Trib Total Media
Altoona's Kevin Givens taken on Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2014 in Altoona.

Rising redshirt freshman defensive tackle Kevin Givens was on Penn State coach James Franklin’s radar after posting impressive weight-room numbers during offseason training.

Less than a week into spring practices, though, Franklin has dubbed Givens more than just a “weight-room warrior.”

“(Givens) is kind of the talk of spring ball right now,” Franklin said. “He’s just so explosive. He’s just so strong. He’s been a guy that’s really stood out so far.”

At the first practice, Givens went against offensive lineman Derek Dowrey in a one-on-one drill.

In size terms, the Givens-Dowrey battle was a mismatch in favor of the latter. Givens weighs just more than 270 pounds, which is on the lighter size for a defensive tackle. Dowrey weighs about 335 pounds.

Givens, however, drove Dowrey backward with consistency.

“The dude’s just like a ball of muscle,” linebacker Jason Cabinda said about Givens. “He’s going to be a disruptive guy.”

Cabinda, who started for the Nittany Lions last season at middle linebacker, is in a position battle with Nyeem Wartman-White. Cabinda took over at middle linebacker after Wartman-White suffered a season-ending injury against Temple in the first week of the 2015 campaign.

Despite the battle for the starting job at middle linebacker, the players are embracing the competition. Whoever wins the role, Cabinda said, will make the team better.

However, because of this make-the-team-better mentality, both players would be willing to make the switch to outside linebacker if it were for the good of the team.

“We’re very flexible,” Cabinda said. “We’ll be willing to play whatever position is necessary in order to put the team in the best position to win.”

Transitioning to new coordinators poses challenges for the Lions, though Cabinda said having a familiar face take over as defensive coordinator has aided the process.

Brent Pry replaced Bob Shoop as the Lions’ defensive coordinator after Shoop took the same job at Tennessee. Pry served as co-defensive coordinator and linebackers coach for his first two seasons with the team. He knows the skills and shortcomings of each player, which adds a level of comfort to a new coaching situation.

New offensive coordinator Joe Moorhead, who previously was the head coach at Fordham, has implemented a new system — one that relies on up-tempo play-calling and quick decision-making.

Franklin said players are adjusting to the new offense rather smoothly compared to what normally happens when teams install a new playbook.

With the departure of quarterback Christian Hackenberg, who declared for the NFL Draft following the team’s 24-17 TaxSlayer Bowl loss to Georgia on Jan. 2, a new passer will be under center for the Lions in 2016.

Rising redshirt sophomore Trace McSorley has shown to be more consistent than rising redshirt freshman Tommy Stevens, Franklin said, but that mostly is because McSorley has more collegiate experience.

Matt Martell is a freelance writer.

Categories: PennState
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.