Archive

ShareThis Page
Penn State hoops welcomes highly rated class | TribLIVE.com
PennState

Penn State hoops welcomes highly rated class

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, November 12, 2014 7:09 p.m

Penn State basketball signed what it’s touting as “the best recruiting class in the program’s history” Wednesday.

Two of the three players who signed national letters of intent are ranked among ESPN’s top 2015 prospects, and 247Sports.com ranks the Nittany Lions’ class among the top 30 in the nation.

“We are ecstatic about the direction of our program,” coach Patrick Chambers said in a release. “The diversity of this class is something that really excites me.”

Guard Josh Reaves and forwards Mike Watkins and Deividas “Davis” Zemgulis will join the program in time for next season, which will be Chambers’ fifth at PSU.

A Philadelphia-area native, Chambers made Watkins his sixth Philly recruit. The 6-foot-8 Watkins is rated as the nation’s No. 89 recruit by ESPN. Joined by Reaves in being designated as a four-star prospect by ESPN, Watkins led Math, Civics & Science Charter to the PIAA Class A championship game last season. He transferred to Phelps School for his senior year.

Reaves (No. 81 by ESPN) is a 6-4 guard from Fairfax, Va., who transferred from Paul VI to renowned basketball school Oak Hill Academy for his senior year.

A native of Lithuania, the 6-6 Zemgulis played for Lithuania at the under-16 European Championships in 2013 before coming to the U.S. as an exchange student.

An ESPN three-star recruit, Zemgulis attends St. Mary Ryken in Leonardtown, Md.

Penn State, which has just two winning seasons since 2001, went 16-18 last season. Its season begins Friday against Morgan State.

Chris Adamski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at cadamski@tribweb.com or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.