Archive

ShareThis Page
Penn State mens basketball wins fourth in a row, improves to 6-1 | TribLIVE.com
PennState

Penn State mens basketball wins fourth in a row, improves to 6-1

Tribune-Review
| Friday, November 28, 2014 6:54 p.m

LEWISBURG — D.J. Newbill poured in 28 points, including 21 in the second half, as the visiting Nittany Lions held off Bucknell, 88-80, on Friday.

Ross Travis scored 14 points for Penn State (6-1), which has won four straight games by a total of 17 points. Brandon Taylor collected 12 points and a team-high eight rebounds and Shaler graduate Geno Thorpe added 12 points off the bench for the Nittany Lions.

John Azzinaro hit four 3-pointers en route to a team-high 18 points for Bucknell (2-5). Nana Foulland and Chris Hass each scored 14 points and J.C. Show added 10 off the bench for the Bison.

The Nittany Lions led 58-48 with 11:50 left after Donovon Jack’s offensive rebound and bucket, but the Bison chipped away and pulled even at 66 on a pair of Cory Starkey free throws with 6:19 to play before Taylor’s jumper set off six straight points from Penn State and Bucknell didn’t get closer than five the rest of the way.

Penn State scored the game’s first seven points and stretched it to 14-5 on Newbill’s steal and dunk. The Nittany Lions shot 53.6 percent in the first half and went to the break with a 39-33 lead after Newbill’s three-point play with 35 seconds left.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.