Archive

Penn State notebook: Franklin shrugs off special-teams miscues | TribLIVE.com
PennState

Penn State notebook: Franklin shrugs off special-teams miscues

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. — Penn State coach James Franklin bristled at a question during his postgame news conference Saturday about the performance of special-teams coordinator Charles Huff.

The Nittany Lions’ special teams have been more liability than asset, a far contrast from the Franklin/Huff company line that the unit will be a strength.

But Franklin disagreed that Huff could be at fault.

“We will look at it, and we evaluate everything in the program,” Franklin said. “But I don’t really look at it that way.”

Three peculiar errors cost Penn State in a 16-14 loss Saturday at Illinois.

The second-half kickoff into a stiff breeze seemingly died in mid-air, fell to the ground near the PSU 20-yard line and was pounced on by Illinois. Franklin said he didn’t believe it was strategic, but Illini coaches and players told reporters that kicker Taylor Zalewski indeed was instructed to kick the ball high into the air.

Chris Gulla, who lost his punting job this season, has been a reliable holder aside from his bobble of a first-quarter field-goal snap Saturday.

And of the flinch of Evan Schwan and another PSU lineman during an Illinois punt snap that eventually led to an Illini field goal, Franklin said, “That happens sometimes.”

The only correction Franklin offered for the errors was that he believed the “up men” on the kickoff return team need to be more aware of where the ball is, in order to make a fair catch in that situation.

A tired defense?

Franklin said he and Illinois coach Tim Beckman discussed during pregame how their respective teams are dealing with fatigue.

For the Lions and their scholarship-sapped roster, the effects are more apparent.

“It’s an issue for everybody this time of year,” Franklin said. “It’s magnified because of the situation we’re in.”

Asked whether he thought his defense was “worn out,” Franklin replied, “There’s no doubt.”

It appeared that way late in Saturday’s game, when Penn State was down two more regulars because of injury. Three of Illinois’ four longest drives — in terms of both yardage and plays — were on its final three possessions. Penn State allowed the Illini to march 150 combined yards during those three drives after they traveled 167 over the previous 10.

Illinois punted on its first six possessions but punted only twice over its final seven drives.

“(Being tired) is a mental thing,” PSU cornerback Jordan Lucas said. “We have lot of tough guys on the team who do lot of things throughout the week and in practice to keep our bodies right. So I never listen to that or say anything like that. Of course, you’re not like you were Aug. 30 (for the season opener), but it’s all mental.”

Sudden fumbles

Huff, who also is Penn State’s running backs coach, said Lions ball carriers have been taught how to hold the ball near their chin. It’s an effort to avoid fumbles. PSU running backs had no fumbles through nine games. But they have one in each of the past two games.

Akeel Lynch’s second-quarter fumble Saturday ended a drive.

“If you watch the play, we were carrying the ball with two hands … like a option quarterback,” Franklin said. “We do ball security drills every single day, (and) we never coach that and have never talked about doing that.”

Chris Adamski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.