PSU’s Franklin among highest-paid college football coaches |

PSU’s Franklin among highest-paid college football coaches

James Franklin is the nation’s eighth-highest paid college football coach, according to figures compiled by USA Today and released Wednesday.

West Virginia’s Dana Holgorsen’s total pay of $3,080,000 ranked 23rd nationally, sixth in the 10-team Big 12.

Total 2014 compensation for Pitt’s Paul Chryst was not available. The university would not disclose the figure when contacted by the Tribune-Review.

Hired by Penn State to replace Bill O’Brien in January, Franklin’s $4.3 million annual compensation ranks third in the Big Ten behind Michigan State’s Mark Dantonio ($5,636,145) and Ohio State’s Urban Meyer ($4,536,640).

Alabama’s Nick Saban is the nation’s highest-paid coach at $7,160,187 in total pay, followed by Dantonio, Oklahoma’s Bob Stoops ($5,058,333), Texas A&M’s Kevin Sumlin ($5,006,000), Texas coach Charlie Strong ($5,000,270), Meyer and LSU’s Les Miles ($4,369,582).

Directly behind Franklin are Upper St. Clair High School graduate Kirk Ferentz of Iowa ($4,075,000) and South Carolina’s Steve Spurrier ($4,016,900) to round out the top 10.

USA Today requested compensation information from all 128 FBS schools and included base salary as well as other guaranteed income, deferred payments and certain bonuses.

The report includes information for 121 schools. Pitt was one of several whose information was available only for the 2012 season. Chryst’s salary that season was $1,578,757.

In addition to total pay, Franklin is eligible for bonuses of up to $1 million and Holgorsen $600,000. Chryst has no performance-based bonuses, per the report.

Penn State released the terms of Franklin’s contract upon his hiring.

Staff writer Jerry DiPaola contributed. Chris Adamski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.