Moon Republican state Rep. Mark Mustio won’t seek re-election |
Politics Election

Moon Republican state Rep. Mark Mustio won’t seek re-election

Wesley Venteicher
Mark Mustio

Rep. Mark Mustio, R-Moon, announced Monday he won’t seek re-election after his eighth term in office ends in November.

“With great strides and victories on major priorities such as legislative reduction, liquor privatization and stopping property tax windfalls after a reassessment in Allegheny County, there is no better time for me to close out my nearly 15.5 years of serving the people of the 44th Legislative District,” Mustio said in a news release. “There are still many initiatives I hope to see accomplished, and I plan to stay involved and finish strong.”

Mustio’s announcement brings to 16 the number of house Republicans in the state who have confirmed they won’t seek re-election this year, according to an Associated Press analysis .

Democrat Michele Knoll, a former teacher, has announced she is running for the seat, which represents the area around Pittsburgh International Airport.

Mustio is chairman of the Professional Licensure Committee and sits on the Liquor Control Committee, the Rules Committee and the Committee on Committees. Mustio first won election to the seat in a 2003 special election.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5676, [email protected] or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.