Archive

ShareThis Page
Democrats look to teachers for mid-terms | TribLIVE.com
Politics/Election

Democrats look to teachers for mid-terms

webtextbooks

As teachers take a stand for better pay and funding for public schools in states as varied as West Virginia, Oklahoma and Kentucky, some are predicting their issues could be a factor in the upcoming mid-term elections.

Education Weekly reported Friday that Democrats in state legislatures across the county hope to turn public sentiment for striking teachers into wins at the polls this fall.

“In states such as North Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin, Democrats have framed themselves in political ads and candidate talking points as the party that will rescue financially struggling public schools from the grip of fiscally conservative Republicans, who fully control more than half the nation’s statehouses,” Daarel Burnette II wrote.

But those counting on flipping state houses based on education might want to take a look at Pennsylvania as they plot strategy.

Seems like we’ve heard this story before in Pennsylvania, where public education funding played a role in the 2014 gubernatorial race .

Gov. Tom Wolf managed to parlay strong support for public education, which had taken funding hits during the recession, and several other issues into a 2014 victory over incumbent Republican Gov. Tom Corbett. Republicans, nonetheless, maintained and continue to hold strong majorities in the Legislature.

Wolf, who continues to push for improved funding for K-12 schools, is seeking re-election this fall in a mid-term election featuring all members of the state House and half of the Senate.

Debra Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-320-7996 or derdley@tribweb.com or via Twitter @deberdley_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.