Michael Cohen still weighing Senate interview amid legal troubles |
Politics Election

Michael Cohen still weighing Senate interview amid legal troubles

WASHINGTON — Michael Cohen’s criminal defense attorney has contacted the Senate Judiciary Committee about scheduling a possible interview with his client, President Trump’s former personal attorney.

Cohen attorney Guy Petrillo said Friday that he’s talked with the committee about a voluntary interview “prior to sentencing” in Cohen’s federal court case.

George Hartmann, a spokesman for Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, said the committee is waiting on Cohen. “Mr. Petrillo indicated they could not yet schedule an interview, but that he would contact the committee when his client is ready,” Hartmann said Friday.

Cohen, the longtime lawyer and fixer for Trump before he became president, pleaded guilty Aug. 21 to charges including paying hush money in violation of campaign finance laws shortly before the 2016 election to women alleging they had past affairs with Trump. Lanny Davis, another of Cohen’s lawyers, said after the plea was entered in court that Trump directed Cohen to “commit a crime.”

Grassley said in a letter to Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse, a committee member, that Davis had previously indicated Cohen was willing to testify but “retreated” this week in an email citing “other pending criminal matters” and referring the committee to Cohen’s other lawyers.

New York state prosecutors have taken preliminary steps to open criminal investigations into Cohen and possibly into the president’s business, according to people familiar with the matter.

“As I have said many times, I am committed to following the facts wherever they lead, and to working in a bipartisan fashion whenever possible,” Grassley said in the letter to Whitehouse. “This committee will continue attempts to reschedule the voluntary interview to which Mr. Cohen had previously agreed.”

Davis declined to comment Friday, deferring to Petrillo.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.