ShareThis Page
House Republican campaign chairman rebukes Steve King for comments on white nationalism |

House Republican campaign chairman rebukes Steve King for comments on white nationalism

The Washington Post
Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, in his office in Washington, D.C.

WASHINGTON — The chairman of the House Republican campaign arm on Tuesday condemned recent remarks made by Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, on white nationalism, becoming the highest-profile GOP leader to rebuke the lawmaker to date.

In a tweet Tuesday afternoon, Rep. Steve Stivers, R-Ohio, chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said that King’s “recent comments, actions, and retweets are completely inappropriate.”

“We must stand up against white supremacy and hate in all forms, and I strongly condemn this behavior,” Stivers said in the tweet.

Stivers’ remarks set him apart from the top three House Republican leaders — Speaker Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California and Majority Whip Steve Scalise of Louisiana — all of whom have declined to criticize King in recent weeks.

King issued a statement on Twitter late Tuesday afternoon in which he denounced “establishment Never Trumpers” and attacks that he said were “orchestrated by nasty, desperate, and dishonest fake news” whose goal is to “flip the House and impeach Donald Trump.”

“Americans, all created equal by God, with all our races, ethnicities, and national origins-legal immigrants and natural-born citizens, together make up the Shining City on the Hill,” he tweeted.

King’s Democratic opponent, J.D. Scholten, said he welcomed Stivers’ comments.

“Last week I issued a challenge for at least one Republican elected official to condemn @SteveKingIA’s recent behavior. I applaud @RepSteveStivers, Chair of the NRCC. Respect,” Scholten said in a tweet.

King has a long history of incendiary remarks on race and immigration throughout his 16 years in Congress. Last year, King was widely criticized after he declared in a tweet that he agreed with far-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders that “our civilization” cannot be restored “with somebody else’s babies.”

But the lawmaker’s actions have drawn increased scrutiny in the wake of the mass shooting Saturday at a Pittsburgh synagogue. The massacre, in which 11 people were killed, was the deadliest attack on Jews in the United States.

In June, King prompted criticism when he retweeted a message sent by Mark Collett, a self-described “Nazi sympathizer.” King declined to delete the retweet.

Earlier this month, King tweeted his support for Faith Goldy, a white nationalist who was running for Toronto mayor. An editor for the conservative Weekly Standard responded by writing a piece in which he called King “America’s most deplorable congressman.” Ryan, McCarthy and Scalise did not respond to requests for comment from The Washington Post on King’s endorsement.

And last week, it emerged that King had met in August with members of a far-right Austrian party with historical Nazi ties and declared that “Western civilization is on the decline.”

Stivers’ admonition was made hours after Land O’Lakes announced that it was withdrawing its support for King. The company had faced calls for a boycott after it emerged that it had made a $2,500 contribution to King’s campaign in June. Tech giant Intel also recently announced in an email to employees that it was ending its support for King in light of his recent comments, Fast Company reported.

The nonpartisan Cook Political Report changed its rating for King’s district Tuesday from “likely Republican” to “lean Republican,” noting that Scholten has vastly outraised King, “in large part thanks to disgusted national donors who view King as a racist.”

Even so, the political handicapper noted that “it’s less clear his views have damaged his political standing back home in northwest Iowa,” where King has been easily re-elected in the past and where President Trump won a resounding victory in 2016.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.