ShareThis Page
Penguins’ Jim Rutherford doesn’t foresee trading Phil Kessel |

Penguins’ Jim Rutherford doesn’t foresee trading Phil Kessel

Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Phil Kessel waves to the crowd on Grant Street during the parade on Wednesday, June 14, 2017, celebrating the Penguins' Stanley Cup win.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Phil Kessel raises the Cupafter beating the Predators in the Stanley Cup Final Sunday, June 11 , 2017 at Bridgestone Arena.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Phil Kessel takes a shot against the Blue Jackets in the second period during game one in first round Stanley Cup action Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at PPG Arena.

Penguins general manager Jim Rutherford didn’t say he never will trade Phil Kessel, but he painted the high-scoring winger as an important part of his team’s roster during a radio interview Thursday morning.

The idea of trading Kessel was popular talk-show fodder in recent days.

“Phil Kessel’s an important part of the Penguins,” Rutherford said in an interview on 93.7 The Fan. “He gets a lot of points. He scores big goals. He sets up big goals. The more impact players that you have, like we have, the better chance you have of winning.

“It may not be on a regular basis, but it may come at a certain time in a series or whatnot, just like it did against Ottawa. Kessel came up with the big goal in that 1-0 game (in Game 2 of the Eastern Conference finals).

“He’s an important part. I don’t want to sit here and say that a certain player’s not going to get traded at some point in his career. I mean, Phil already did. But that’s not something that I foresee happening right now.”

Kessel was a highly productive player last season, recording 70 points in the regular season and 23 points in 25 playoff games. But his goal total, which peaked at 37 twice during his six seasons in Toronto from 2009-15, fell to 23.

Kessel had a strong relationship with assistant coach Rick Tocchet, who left the Penguins to become coach of the Arizona Coyotes on Tuesday.

A trade to add a third-line center, meanwhile, remains on the offseason agenda for the Penguins. They need to find a replacement for Nick Bonino, who left for Nashville in free agency, but Rutherford told the radio station the addition is not likely to break the bank.

The Penguins are about $9.5 million under the $75 million salary cap with 12 forwards and seven defensemen under contract.

Winger Conor Sheary and defenseman Brian Dumoulin are due big raises in arbitration.

After that process is complete, Rutherford said the Penguins project they’ll have about $2 million left to add a third-line center.

Unless the team moves out a player making a significant salary, financial reality would rule out some of the big-ticket centers who have been mentioned in Penguins-related rumors.

For instance, Rutherford said, to his knowledge, Carolina’s Jordan Staal, who makes $6 million a year, is not available in trade.

Colorado’s Matt Duchene also makes $6 million per year. Toronto’s Tyler Bozak makes $4.2 million.

Note: The Penguins will participate in a four-team rookie tournament Sept. 8-11 at the 1,800-seat Harbor Creek rink in Buffalo, N.Y. The Sabres, New Jersey Devils and Boston Bruins also will take part. For the previous four seasons, the Penguins traveled to a prospect tournament in London, Ontario.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter at @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.