Archive

ShareThis Page
Tim Benz, Mark Madden rip Steelers over brutal showing in Oakland | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz, Mark Madden rip Steelers over brutal showing in Oakland

Tim Benz
AP18343826005079
Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger (7) is sacked by Oakland Raiders defensive tackle Clinton McDonald (97) during the first half of an NFL football game in Oakland, Calif., Sunday, Dec. 9, 2018. (AP Photo/Ben Margot)

The Steelers’ latest in a string of atrocious losses against the Raiders may have been the worst yet. They fell 24-21 in Oakland and may have punted away their playoff hopes as a result.

Mark Madden of 105.9 the X and the Trib joins me to rehash everything that went wrong. It’s a long list. And we didn’t hold back.


LISTEN: Tim Benz, Mark Madden rip Steelers for poor showing in Oakland


Mark and I lambaste the team for:

• Its latest upset loss against a double-digit underdog

• The decision to keep Ben Roethlisberger on the bench

• The awful use of timeouts

• The terrible defense

• The rotten run game

• The perilous playoff standings

• The awful kicker

Aside from that, we took it easy on the boys.

Oh, and we didn’t leave the Penguins off the hook either following their loss in Ottawa.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.