Archive

Burrell girls charge back to drop Jeannette | TribLIVE.com
High School Basketball

Burrell girls charge back to drop Jeannette

582576Basketballstock2

Burrell erased a seven-point deficit in the second half and raced past Jeannette for a 67-38 girls basketball victory Friday at the Hempfield Christmas Tournament.

Kaylen Sharrow scored 24 points and sparked Class 4A Burrell’s second-half uprising with 19 points, including 12 in the fourth quarter, as the Bucs limited Class 2A Jeannette to 14 second-half points.

“What a relief to see our girls pull together like that,” Burrell coach Joel Ceraso said. “I’m pleased with where we’re at.”

Burrell (3-4) rallied from deficits of 24-23 at halftime and 31-24 early in the third quarter by outscoring Jeannette, 44-14, in the second half.

Sharrow, a 5-foot-11 senior, made four of Burrell’s six second-half 3-pointers as the Bucs used an 26-0 run to take a 50-31 lead early in the fourth quarter.

“She’s a senior. She’s plays with a lot of heart, and we expect that type of leadership from her,” Ceraso said. “We’re young. We start three freshmen.”

Two of them also scored in double figures. Ally Fisher added 18 points and Hope Clark scored 11 for Burrell. The other one, Anna Novak, contributed nine rebounds.

Senior Grace Omecinski led Burrell with 12 rebounds and also scored eight points.

Senior Dymond Crawford’s 18 points, 15 in the first half, paced Jeannette (2-6).

“We’re just not very deep,” Jeannette coach Jonathan Bass said. “When we have foul trouble, it just compounds matters.”

Crawford, who came in averaging 23 points, was called for her third foul with 3 minutes, 16 seconds left in the third quarter. Bass pulled her briefly from the Jeannette lineup with the Jayhawks clinging to a 31-30 lead after Burrell closed in with consecutive 3-pointers by Fisher and Sharrow.

Following a steal and layup by Clark and a 3-pointer by Fisher that put Burrell ahead 35-31 Crawford re-entered the game for Jeannette.

But Burrell, which totaled eight 3-pointers, kept scoring while repeatedly denying Crawford and the Jayhawks, who made three shots from behind the arc.

“I thought we settled for 3-pointers early on,” Ceraso said. “We’d like to be more of an inside-outside team. The way we were playing was not within the confines of our offense. I’m just trying to make it simple because I don’t want to put too much pressure on the girls.”

Both coaches are in their first season at their respective schools. Ceraso left Leechburg and became a late hire at Burrell, and Bass was elevated at Jeannette to head coach from assistant.

“I’m tring to change the culture of this program,” Bass said. “We’ve been in every game this year. We’ll be winning, and you’d think we’re losing by the way the girls react in the huddle. We need everyone to stay positive because you’ve got to play hard for the entire game. It’s a long season.

“At times, we’re playing well. This has been a tough nonconference schedule, but I think we’ll be OK in the section.”

The Jayhawks are 1-3 against teams outside of Section 2-2A, beating Carrick and, in addition to Burrell, losing to Obama Academy and Seton La Salle.

Jeannette closed the first half on an 8-0 run to take a 24-23 halftime lead. But the Jayhawks, with Crawford scoring just three second-half points and none in the third quarter, folded.

Ari Clark added 10 points for Jeannette.

Dave Mackall is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.