ShareThis Page
Clarion’s version of ‘Dr. J’ has been a key contributor |
District College

Clarion’s version of ‘Dr. J’ has been a key contributor

United Press International
| Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:46 p.m
Clarion's Aaron Johnson, a Moon native who transferred from Princeton, ranks second on the team with 6.6 rebounds per game. (Courtesy of Clarion University)

“Dr. Aaron Johnson from Princeton” has a nice ring to it.

But despite having an academic scholarship to an Ivy League university and eyes on medical school, something was missing for Johnson as a freshman last winter: basketball.

So the Moon native transferred to Clarion, and Johnson quickly has become one of the team’s best players. He is averaging 9.0 points and 6.6 rebounds since the NCAA cleared him for the second semester. Johnson, a 6-foot-4 forward who is a freshman eligibility-wise, also leads the Golden Eagles (5-13) with a .788 free-throw percentage and 1.2 blocks per game.

And even though Johnson left the Ivy League and changed majors from chemical and biological engineering to molecular biology, his career plans haven’t changed.

“You think because it’s Princeton that (transferring) really shouldn’t be a thought, but I felt that most important for me was being comfortable and enjoying myself because these are supposed to be the best four years of your life,” said Johnson, his class valedictorian. “I took that into careful consideration and decided I’d be better overall at Clarion.”

Johnson had hoped to walk on at Division I Princeton but only made junior varsity as a freshman. The JV team practiced sporadically and occasionally played local prep schools. It was basketball withdrawal for Johnson, who started every game during four varsity seasons at Moon and is the school’s all-time leading scorer and rebounder.

“It was tough, let me tell you,” said Johnson, whose father, Gil, played for Pitt from 1988-90. “It just wasn’t the same not having that everyday experience working with coaches, working with teammates. It definitely threw me off.”

When Johnson decided to transfer over the summer, D-II Clarion re-emerged after also recruiting him out of high school.

“You go where you’re comfortable and go where you’re wanted,” Golden Eagles coach Ron Righter said. “We really wanted him, not just as a player but as a student and teammate. I think this will be an outstanding fit.”

Johnson’s intelligence became obvious immediately. He earned a 4.0 GPA during the fall semester and also impressed during practice. Righter said he often poses questions to his team, and one day the subject turned to European history.

“We had a defense called ‘Garibaldi’ where we trap all over the floor. I said, ‘Guys, can anybody tell me about Garibaldi?’ The guys were looking at each other, and they had no clue.

“Aaron raises his hand and says, ‘Yeah, I know. Italian commander.’ And he went on for about two minutes about (Giuseppe) Garibaldi. Guys are dying. We were just rolling around. … He’s like a walking encyclopedia.”

On the court, Johnson still has much to learn. He’s one of the top first-year players in the PSAC, but he’s adjusting to the rigors of being an undersized power forward in a top-level D-II league. All this while working off the rust after not playing competitively for 1½ years.

“I really want to work in the offseason on getting bigger, stronger, quicker, more explosive,” Johnson said. “I think that’s what I lost most of in that year-and-a-half is the explosiveness that I had. Something that I’m working toward getting back.”

Jeff Vella is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JeffVella_Trib.

Categories: College-District
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.