ShareThis Page
Rawlins transferring from WVU |
District College

Rawlins transferring from WVU

Monessen quarterback Chavas Rawlins. Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review

Back in January, a hot debate raged over whether or not Chavas Rawlins would be permitted to walk with his graduating Monessen classmates in June after deciding to graduate early and begin his academic and athletic career at West Virginia University.

Well, when Rawlins walks with his classmates on June 7, you can bet that he won’t be wearing a WVU T-shirt under his gown.

That’s because Rawlins, an all-state quarterback for the Greyhounds, is transferring from WVU, ending his career there before it actually got off the ground.

“It wasn’t a football decision. It wasn’t an academic decision. It was pretty much a comfort decision,” said Monessen coach Andy Pacak about Rawlins’ decision to leave the Morgantown school. “He just decided that he wasn’t comfortable there and being that he was going to be red-shirted in the upcoming season, this is the perfect time for him to transfer. He wasn’t going to play football next season anyway.”

Pacak intimated that one reason for Rawlins leaving is that the quarterbacks coach who recruited him at WVU, Jake Spavital, left in January to take a coaching position at Texas A&M.

“He was happy there. He was treated well there,” Pacak said. “He did everything he had to do to be there. But without the coach who recruited him to work with, it may have affected his comfort level there.”

Pacak said that Rawlins has not decided where he will attend college in the fall.

“All options are open,” Pacak said. “He may go through the recruiting process again.”

Rawlins was unavailable for comment for the story.

Jeff Oliver is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2666 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.