ShareThis Page
Slippery Rock ousted in Division II quarterfinals |
District College

Slippery Rock ousted in Division II quarterfinals

United Press International
| Saturday, December 1, 2018 5:57 p.m
Slippery Rock’s Roland Rivers threw for 177 passing yards and rushed for 61 more in Saturday’s loss.

Slippery Rock’s run in the Division II football playoffs ended in the quarterfinals Saturday after a 21-17 loss to No. 11 Notre Dame (Ohio).

After falling behind 21-10 at halftime, The Rock (11-3) shut down the Falcons (13-0). Wes Hills scored on a 19-yard touchdown with 3 minutes, 5 seconds left in the third quarter to get Slippery Rock within four points, but it couldn’t score again. Hills ran for 154 yards to set the single-season school record with 1,714 yards, despite missing three games with an injury. Notre Dame entered the game second in the nation against the run (62.6 yards per game).

Slippery Rock’s Roland Rivers III threw for 177 passing yards and rushed for 61 more. Kyle Hall led the defense with 14 tackles, a forced fumble and an interception.

Jale McLaughlin ran for 172 yards and a touchdown for the Falcons.

Slippery Rock scored first on Jake Chapla’s 37-yard field goal with 4:02 left in the first quarter before the Falcons went ahead for good on McLaughlin’s 22-yard touchdown run nearly three minutes later.

After Chris Brimm hit Andrew Turski with a 5-yard scoring pass early in the second quarter, Rivers III threw a 9-yard touchdown pass to Jermaine Wynn Jr. to pull the Rock within four. But with 22 seconds left in the half, Brimm hit Ross with a 52-yard strike to send Notre Dame (Ohio) into the half with an 11-point lead. Brimm threw for 206 yards, and Marvelle Ross caught four passes for 112 yards.

Categories: College-District
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.