IUP football remains at No. 4 in AFCA Division II coaches poll |
District College

IUP football remains at No. 4 in AFCA Division II coaches poll

Michael Love

The IUP football team, coming off a 21-17 season-opening win at No. 15 Ashland, solidified its No. 4 ranking in the latest American Football Coaches Association (AFCA) Division II Top 25 poll released Monday.

A connection from a pair of former WPIAL stars provided the game-winning score as quarterback Lenny Williams Jr., a Sto-Rox graduate, found wideout Ricky Rogers, a Gateway product, on a 13-yard touchdown pass with 10 minutes left.

The top seven teams in the poll remained unchanged. Texas A&M-Commerce (1-0) is at No. 1, followed by West Florida (1-0) at No. 2 and Minnesota State (1-0) at No. 3.

Fort Hays State (1-0) rounds out the top five, with Northwest Missouri State (1-0) at No. 6, Hardin (1-0) at No. 7, Grand Valley State (1-0) at No. 8, Ferris State (1-0) at No. 9, and Midwestern State (1-0) at No. 10.

Williams totaled 277 yards and threw three touchdowns to Rogers, who was named the Pennsylvania State Athletic Conference (PSAC) Western Division Offensive Athlete of the Week for his performance. Rogers caught six passes for 73 yards, scoring touchdowns in the first, second and fourth quarters.

West Chester (1-0) is the only other PSAC team in the poll as it checks in at No. 23.

With season-opening wins, PSAC members Shippensburg, Bloomsburg, Edinboro, California, Slippery Rock and Kutztown all are receiving votes.

Michael Love is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at [email protected] or via Twitter @MLove_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.