Elijah Minnie named to Julius Erving Award watch list |
District College

Elijah Minnie named to Julius Erving Award watch list

Bill Beckner Jr.
Elijah Minnie

Elijah Minnie was added to a national college basketball watch list on the eve of his final season at Eastern Michigan.

A redshirt senior from Monessen, Minnie is among 20 players up for the Julius Erving Award.

The fifth-year award, named after NBA great Dr. J, recognizes the best small forward in the Division I game. A national committee formed the preseason watch list.

The 6-foot-9 Minnie led the Eagles in scoring last season with 16.8 points per game, to go with 6.1 rebounds, 1.9 blocks and 1.8 steals.

The committee can tweak the list throughout the season, adding or subtracting players as they see fit.

Previous winners include: Mikal Bridges of Villanova (2018), Josh Hart of Villanova (2017), Denzel Valentine of Michigan State (2016), and Stanley Johnson of Arizona (2015).

The other candidates are:

Dylan Windler, Belmont

Cam Reddish, Duke

Rui Hachimura, Gonzaga

Keldon Johnson, Kentucky

Sam Hauser, Marquette

Aaron Wiggins, Maryland

Caleb Martin, Nevada

Nassir Little, North Carolina

Louis King, Oregon

Tres Tinkle, Oregon State

Lamar Stevens, Penn State

O’Shea Brissett, Syracuse

Admiral Schofield, Tennessee

Jordon Varnado, Troy

Kris Wilkes, UCLA

De’Andre Hunter, Virginia

Jaylen Hoard, Wake Forest

Matisse Thybulle, Washington

Robert Franks Jr., Washington State

Bill Beckner is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bill at [email protected] or via Twitter @BillBeckner.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.