ShareThis Page
Three things to watch in district football |
District College

Three things to watch in district football

| Thursday, November 8, 2018 7:18 p.m
Washington & Jefferson’s Andrew Wolf leads the PAC in receptions (43), receiving yards (148.8 per game, fifth in the nation) and touchdowns (13).

As the season winds toward the finish line, there remains plenty at stake for teams around the district.

Here’s a look at what to keep an eye on this weekend:

Biggest test for Slippery Rock

Despite zooming to the top of the always-tough PSAC West with an unbeaten conference record, The Rock hasn’t garnered a whole lot of respect nationally, remaining outside the top 25 in the latest AFCA poll.

Slippery Rock (9-1) gets its shot at a national ranking and a spot in the NCAA Division II playoffs when it hosts ninth-ranked PSAC East champ West Chester (9-0) on Saturday afternoon.

Both offenses are explosive. Both defenses are stingy. The key for Slippery Rock will be third downs.

The Golden Rams led the PSAC with 41 sacks and in opponent third-down conversion rate (24.4 percent), so The Rock offense will need to avoid third-and-long situations. On defense, SRU will have to get off the field as West Chester led the conference in time of possession (34:12).

PAC foes down to wire

Washington & Jefferson and Case Western Reserve enter the final weekend of the regular season with identical 7-1 records in the Presidents’ Athletic Conference. Because W&J beat the Spartans earlier this season, the Presidents get the PAC’s automatic bid to the Division III playoffs if the teams finished tied.

So even with a loss, W&J still gets the bid if Case Western also loses.

The Presidents play at Waynesburg. The Yellow Jackets (4-5, 4-4) have been sound defensively, but their offense hasn’t scored more than 24 points in a game this season. That isn’t likely to cut it against Jacob Adams, Andrew Wolf and Co.

Case Western hosts Carnegie Mellon (4-4, 3-4). Spartans QB Drew Saxton (South Fayette) needs 298 yards passing to reach 3,000 for the season. He averages 300.2 per game.

Milestone for Allegheny?

The Gators don’t have anything to play for with regard to the postseason. But a home win over Oberlin (2-7, 2-6 NCAC) will clinch the program’s first winning record since 2010.

Allegheny enters at 5-3 in the NCAC, already guaranteeing a winning mark in the conference for the first time since 2012. A victory over Oberlin would give the Gators a 6-4 overall record.

The game will be the last for a couple of Allegheny stalwarts with WPIAL roots: RB Tyler Balla, from New Kensington via Greensburg Central Catholic, needs 91 yards for his first collegiate 1,000-yard season; and DL Marcus Davenport (Valley), who has six sacks this season.

Charles Curti is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Charles at or via Twitter @CCurti_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.