ShareThis Page
Seton Hill women make 17 3-pointers, score 127 points |
District College

Seton Hill women make 17 3-pointers, score 127 points

| Friday, December 14, 2018 9:30 p.m

Seton Hill almost hit triple digits in their game on Tuesday in West Virginia.

On Friday night, the women’s basketball team reached 100 points — and kept going.

Behind a sizzling shooting performance that produced a head-turning 17 3-pointers, Seton Hill rang up a 127-99 victory over visiting West Virginia State at McKenna Center.

The record-breaking win saw Seton Hill set single-game records for points, 3s, assists,

The Griffins (6-2) made 46 of 81 shots and 17 of 36 3s. They erupted for 69 second-half points and saw six players reach double figures in scoring.

It was one of those in-the-zone nights for the Griffins that left coach Mark Katarski shaking his head.

“On a night like this, you wish you could take the whole team to the County Fair and try to win some stuffed animals,” Katarski said. “We have an extremely unselfish and deep team that passes the ball very well. We met an opponent that likes to play fast just like us and this was the result.”

Tianna Stewart had 18 points, Alison Collins and Lexi Civittolo had 17 apiece, and Madelyn Fisher, Kennedi Stevenson and Courtney Cecere each chipped in 11 for the Griffins, who beat Salem 105-83 earlier in the season at home. They are averaging 87.6 points per game.

Cecere added 11 rebounds and seven assists.

Syd Rabold had 10 assists for the Griffins.

West Virginia State, which made nine 3-pointers, had four players score in double digits.

Bill Beckner is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bill at or via Twitter @BillBeckner.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.