Archive

ShareThis Page
Penn State lands pair of top-5 running backs on early signing day | TribLIVE.com
PennState

Penn State lands pair of top-5 running backs on early signing day

Philly.Com
| Thursday, December 20, 2018 12:18 a.m
554199GTRPittPSU02090918
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Penn State head coach James Franklin leads his team onto the field at the start of their game against Pitt Saturday, Sept. 8, 2018, at Heinz Field.

Penn State picked up a second top-five running back for its recruiting class of 2019 on Wednesday when Noah Cain of IMG Academy in Bradenton, Fla., announced he would sign with the Nittany Lions.

The 5-foot-11, 209-pound Cain, from Baton Rouge, La., chose the Lions over Auburn, Georgia, and Texas. He made his announcement live on ESPN2.

Cain, a consensus four-star recruit, is rated the No. 4 running back in the nation by ESPN, No. 5 by Rivals, and No. 7 by 247Sports.

Cain joins Devyn Ford of Stafford, Va., in Penn State’s recruiting class. The 5-11, 195-pound Ford is rated as the nation’s No. 2 running back by Rivals, as well as No. 5 by 247Sports and No. 8 by ESPN.

The signings of Cain and Ford added to the riches Penn State has been able to attract at running back. In four of the last five years, coach James Franklin has brought in Saquon Barkley (2015), Miles Sanders (2016) and Ricky Slade (2018).

Depending on if Sanders declares for the NFL Draft after the Citrus Bowl on Jan. 1, the battle to determine who would be the featured running back in the preseason could be intense among Slade, Ford and Cain.

Cain became the 18th member of the Lions’ recruiting class.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.