Archive

ShareThis Page
How the ‘Saquon Barkley effect’ propelled Penn State’s recruiting | TribLIVE.com
PennState

How the ‘Saquon Barkley effect’ propelled Penn State’s recruiting

The Morning Call
| Thursday, December 20, 2018 1:12 p.m
560528899944632
Getty Images
Running back Saquon Barkley of the Penn State Nittany Lions reacts on the field after defeating the Washington Huskies 35-28 in the PlayStation Fiesta Bowl at University of Phoenix Stadium on Dec. 30, 2017 in Glendale, Arizona. The Nittany Lions won 35-28.

After declaring Saquon Barkley the NFL’s rookie of the year, Penn State coach James Franklin credited the running back for helping to bring a recruiting surge to State College. Barkley’s success has made Penn State a destination for high-end running backs.

The Lions signed 18 players to their recruiting class Wednesday, the first day of the early signing period, with two considered among the nation’s best backs. Devyn Ford, a five-star prospect from Virginia, and Noah Cain, a four-star recruit from Florida’s IMG Academy, continued a string of backfield recruiting success that began with a phone call to Barkley in 2014.

The “Saquon Barkley effect” is real, Franklin said, and played a major role in helping shape this offensive class.

“When we played in the Rose Bowl, and he’s got that run where he made 17 people miss, and it’s a signature run, I do think that has an impact,” Franklin said, “Players try to envision themselves doing something similar. Whenever you have exciting players like that, it can make a huge impact.”

Cain, a 5-11, 215-pound back, was the newcomer to Penn State’s class, announcing his decision Wednesday on ESPN2. Cain, who transferred to IMG Academy last year from Denton, Texas, chose Penn State over Texas, Auburn and Georgia.

For Franklin, that recruiting process brought a last-minute anxious moment. Cain, who quietly had committed to Penn State several weeks ago, and his family called Franklin after midnight Tuesday with some questions. “And the discussion is coming off like they have not made their decision yet,” Franklin said.

After a “heated discussion,” as Franklin described it, and a late sales pitch, Cain stuck with his commitment. During his announcement, Cain said that Franklin and running backs coach Ja’Juan Seider were “nothing but transparent and consistent with me throughout this whole thing.”

“I saw the way they use the running back,” Cain said of Penn State. “The running back is a focal point, always involved in every play. They’re building something up there, and I plan on winning a national championship with those boys.”

Barkley almost said the same thing in 2014 when he decommitted from Rutgers for Penn State. From there, he became a two-time Big Ten offensive player of the year and the No. 2 pick in the NFL draft.

Since Barkley committed, Penn State has loaded its roster with coveted backs. In 2016, Miles Sanders was the nation’s top-ranked running back, according to Rivals.com. Sanders rushed for 1,223 yards and nine touchdowns this season.

Last year, Ricky Slade was Rivals’ No. 2 all-purpose back. He became Penn State’s No. 2 as a true freshman, scoring six touchdowns and averaging 5.6 yards per carry.

In this class, Ford is Rivals’ No. 2 running back, while Cain is ranked fifth. Ford (5-11, 188 pounds) scored more than 100 touchdowns in high school and will play in next month’s Under-Armour All-American Game in Orlando.

Franklin called both backs “really mature” but wouldn’t compare them to Barkley. In fact, he noted proudly that Penn State rushed for more yards in this regular season (2,503) than it did in 2017 (2,009).

“One of the questions I get is, ‘Are you out there looking for the next Saquon Barkley?’ No,” Franklin said. “I think that’s a huge mistake people make. No different in hiring: You lose a coach, you go try and hire somebody just like the other guy? No, you don’t do that. That’s not how it works.”

Five things we learned on Signing Day

• Penn State’s class includes 17 players ranked as four-star prospects or higher. Among top-10 classes, according to 247Sports, only Alabama (25) and Georgia (19) have more.

• Franklin said he developed a case of pneumonia during his recent recruiting travel. According to Penn State, Franklin flew more than 15,000 miles and visited 23 states the past three weeks, trying to broaden the program’s recruiting reach.

“It looks good on paper, and I think it will end up looking good on the field, as well,” Franklin said. “I don’t know if I necessarily felt that way when we were flying all over the country to multiple states per day.”

• Penn State recruited two quarterbacks: Michael Johnson Jr. of Oregon and Taquan Roberson of New Jersey. Franklin initially pursued that strategy because he wasn’t sure whether current quarterback Tommy Stevens would transfer.

Johnson’s father Michael played quarterback at Arizona State and Akron and now coaches receivers at Oregon. He has been on NFL staffs in San Diego, Atlanta, Baltimore and San Francisco.

• Four of Penn State’s recruits were the top-ranked prospects in their states, according to 247Sports: Johnson Jr., defensive ends Adisa Isaac (New York) and Saleem Wormley (Delaware) and linebacker Brandon Smith (Virginia).

In addition, offensive tackle Anthony Whigan (Lackawanna College) was the top-ranked junior-college prospect in Pennsylvania.

• Penn State has some “wiggle room” to add a few more players, Franklin said. They likely would sign during the second signing period in February.

In the rankings

Penn State 2019 class is among the nation’s top 15, according to the recruiting sites.

247Sports: No. 10

Rivals.com: No. 10

ESPN: No. 12

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.