Barron: PSU should be ‘rewarded’ with lessened sanctions from NCAA |

Barron: PSU should be ‘rewarded’ with lessened sanctions from NCAA

Chris Adamski
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
Penn State University President Eric J. Barron
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
Penn State University's president Eric J. Barron speaks with the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review on the North Shore on Thursday, May 29, 2014.
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
Penn State University President Eric J. Barron

New Penn State president Eric Barron said he believes the university has made “enormous progress” in implementing Freeh Report recommendations and should be “rewarded” via further softening of NCAA sanctions affecting the school’s football program.

During an interview with Tribune-Review reporters and editors Thursday, Barron said he is hopeful former U.S. Sen. George Mitchell will recommend additional relief from NCAA penalties levied in July 2012 in the wake of the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal. An annual report from Mitchell is due in August.

“I would never want to speak for (Mitchell),” said Barron, who took over as president this month, “but I will tell you my personal philosophy: Recognize and reward those people that do good things and work hard and take things seriously.”

The NCAA appointed Mitchell as an independent athletics integrity monitor for Penn State as it worked to implement 119 recommendations of the $8.1 million Freeh Report investigation into Penn State’s response to allegations Sandusky, the Nittany Lions’ former defensive coordinator, was sexually abusing boys — some on university property.

“The institution has taken (the recommendations) extraordinarily seriously,” Barron said. “They’ve made enormous progress, and my personal view is they should be rewarded for taking those steps and doing it much more quickly — and much better — than I think anybody thought that they could. So I’m hopeful that the senator will look at it and say, ‘This is impressive. These folks are not messing around. They’re hitting it head on.’ And he will feel like I do that people who do good things should be rewarded for them.”

Last fall, the NCAA followed Mitchell’s recommendation to gradually restore Penn State’s allotment of football scholarships to the presanctions level. The incoming 2015 recruiting class will have the full 25 available scholarships to offer that every Football Bowl Subdivision school has. By 2016, the Nittany Lions will be permitted to carry the full 85 scholarship players.

Remaining sanctions that could be lessened are lifting the final two seasons of a postseason ban, forgiving part of a $60 million fine that has yet to be paid and restoring 111 vacated wins from 1998-2011.

Penn State agreed to the penalties as part of a consent decree signed with the NCAA almost two years ago. The NCAA acted on the findings of former FBI director Louis Freeh’s university-sanctioned investigation.

Freeh’s report was critical of late legendary coach Joe Paterno, and the university community since has grappled with its recognition of Paterno’s legacy.

Barron referred to his experience in dealing with another fired coaching legend — Florida State’s Bobby Bowden — in explaining his strategy for reconciling PSU factions split on Paterno.

“This is a period of healing, and it takes time,” Barron said. “But you can count on the fact that it’s important to me, and I’m going to do my best to help.”

Barron said he came away impressed after a lunch with current football coach James Franklin. Barron said the two did not discuss pending rape charges against four of Franklin’s former players at Vanderbilt.

The Nashville district attorney’s office has said Franklin cooperated with its investigation and there is no indication Franklin was involved in any wrongdoing.

“My preference is to look at what the (district attorney) in Tennessee said,” Barron said. “.I don’t see a reason to be uncomfortable.”

Barron said he was satisfied with Penn State’s vetting of Franklin when Franklin was hired in January.

Barron also said he “would have to be convinced not to follow through” on the wishes of his predecessor, Rodney Erickson, when it came to personnel decisions, such as hiring a replacement for athletic director Dave Joyner.

Although the “acting” tag was removed from Joyner’s title in January 2013, Erickson said “a national search” would be conducted for the position after a new president was named.

Chris Adamski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.