Hempfield grad Holmberg finishes 9th at USATF national meet |

Hempfield grad Holmberg finishes 9th at USATF national meet

Hempfield's Maddie Holmberg, who earned a bronze medal in the heptathlon at the NCAA Division I track and field championships, placed ninth in the heptathlon at the USATF championships over the weekend.

Penn State redshirt junior Maddie Holmberg finished ninth in the heptathlon at the USA Track and Field championships against the top athletics in the country Sunday in Des Moines, Iowa.

The 2015 Hempfield graduate began the final day in seventh place with 3,478 points. She finished with 5,780 points after she placed fifth in the long jump with a leap of 19 feet, 2 inches, eighth in the javelin with a throw of 131-3 and ninth in the 800 with a time of 2 minutes, 19.23 seconds.

“This is my event,” Holmberg said. “It’s exciting, and I’m looking forward to next season. I have some work to do.”

Erica Bougard, competing for Team Nike, won the 800, the final event of the heptathlon, to win the gold with 6,347 points, edging Alex Gochenour, who finished with 6,003 points. Gochenour finished seventh in the 800.

In the other heptathlon events, Holmberg earned third-place finishes in the shot put (45-9) and 200 (24.17). She placed 12th in the 100-meter hurdles (13.93) and took 13th in the high jump (5-3).

“My whole objective was to come in, have fun and just enjoy the opportunity,” Holmberg said. “My Day 1 went pretty well, and Day 2 didn’t go exactly as I hoped. I still think that I learned a lot through this process and this experience.”

Holmberg earned All-American honors with a third-place (bronze medal) finish June 9 at the NCAA championships in Eugene, Ore. Holmberg’s seven event totals at NCAAs were 5,833 points.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.