Archive

ShareThis Page
Penn State defense proves among best in school history | TribLIVE.com
PennState

Penn State defense proves among best in school history

PTRPSUfb1111914
Barry Reeger | Trib Total Media
Former Penn State defensive coordinator Bob Shoop.

Among the highlights of the “work week” for Penn State’s defensive players is coordinator Bob Shoop running down where the unit ranks in the Big Ten and nationally.

“A lot of the guys are really interested in those numbers,” defensive co-captain Mike Hull said. “You hear guys talking about it in the locker room. It definitely gets people excited.”

The Nittany Lions are making a case that they have the best defense in the FBS. Penn State ranks among the top four in scoring defense, total defense, first downs allowed, rushing defense and opponents’ pass efficiency.

In the latter two categories, the Lions are No. 1 in the country.

“The goal is to try to be No. 1 in every category possible,” senior defensive end C.J. Olaniyan said. “It kind of helps us going into practice for that week with a different mindset. If we’re second ranked in a certain category, we try to get to No. 1 and try to improve — whether it’s our technique or assignments — to make sure we get No. 1 next week.”

PSU is allowing an FBS-best 83.1 rushing yards per game, 4.3 fewer than No. 2 Louisville. Opposing quarterbacks have a 96.89 pass efficiency against the Lions. Only three other teams have held opponents under 100.

The 16.2 points per game Penn State allows trails only Ole Miss (11.9), Alabama (14.5) and Wisconsin (15.3). The Big Ten rival Badgers (244.0) and Clemson (262.1) are the only teams to permit fewer yards per game than the Lions’ 256.6. Wisconsin (129) also is the only team to have allowed fewer first downs this season than Penn State’s 140.

“Our defense is really good. Really good,” coach James Franklin said.

“It’s an awesome thing. We’re very proud of the accomplishments that they’ve made. But ultimately, it’s about wins. If we could finish this season going undefeated one week at a time and trade some rankings on defense, we’d do that.”

None of Penn State’s four defeats can be pegged on the defense: PSU’s offense produced 12.0 points per game during regulation of those losses, and oftentimes the offense or special teams gave the defense short fields with which to defend.

PSU’s 6-4 record likely precludes this defense from being remembered as one of the best in school history. But the numbers — even in today’s hyper-offensive, high-scoring era — suggest that perhaps it should.

• The total defense number is Penn State’s best since the 11-1 team of 1978.

• Penn State’s defense allows 4.1 yards per play, its fewest since the 1990 squad allowed 4.0.

• The most recent defense to hold opponents to fewer than 85 rushing yards per game was the national championship team of 1986.

“It’s just pretty amazing that we’re able to be that high in a lot of those categories,” Hull said. “It’d just be great to go out on a high note as one of the better defenses to come through Penn State.”

Chris Adamski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at cadamski@tribweb.com or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.