Penn State football notebook: Mystery RB to surface Saturday |

Penn State football notebook: Mystery RB to surface Saturday

• Bill O’Brien apparently will unveil a mystery man in the Penn State backfield Saturday at Beaver Stadium. The first-year coach said on his weekly radio show Thursday that a player who has been in the background will play a significant role out of the backfield against Navy. Running back Bill Belton (ankle) and top backup Derek Day (shoulder) are questionable to play in the 3:30 p.m. game, putting redshirt junior Curtis Dukes in line to make his first career start. O’Brien declined to name the player he said will have a key role. O’Brien said earlier this week that he hopes to redshirt running back Akeel Lynch.

• Penn State lost another player Thursday when reserve kicker/punter Matt Marcincin left the team for personal reasons. Marcincin, a redshirt freshman, had been the backup to kicker Sam Ficken. O’Brien hasn’t wavered in his support of Ficken, who missed four field goals and had an extra point blocked in a 17-16 loss at Virginia last weekend. He praised the sophomore again Thursday. “Sam’s a very mature kid, and someday I’m probably going to be working for him,” O’Brien said.

• Redshirt sophomore Paul Jones (Sto-Rox) and true freshman Jesse James (South Allegheny) will see significant playing time against Navy, O’Brien said. Jones will make his collegiate debut after moving from quarterback to tight end. O’Brien lavished praise on both of those players as well as starting right tackle Mike Farrell (Shady Side Academy). O’Brien said he challenged Farrell to step up his play after spring drills and that the senior has made as much improvement as anyone. “He’s coming in and played very, very well for us,” O’Brien said.

— Scott Brown

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.