Penn State recruit forced to quit football by heart condition |

Penn State recruit forced to quit football by heart condition

Old Main on the campus of Penn State

Nana Asiedu’s football career is no more. The incoming freshman at Penn State announced Wednesday night he has a heart condition that will prevent him from playing football again.

“These past couple of weeks have been the toughest time in my life,” Asiedu wrote on Twitter. “I have a genetic heart condition called hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.”

The disease, which is marked by thickened walls of the heart and ventricular cells arranged in a disorganized manner, is found in 1 in 500 people, according to the American Heart Association. Some people experience irregular heart rhythms that on rare occasions — often during strenuous exercise — can lead to cardiac arrest.

“You really can’t play football with this condition,” said Dr. Arthur Feldman, a cardiologist and professor at Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine. “It’s just too dangerous.”

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in young people is a genetic disorder that often does not produce symptoms. It can be detected with an electrocardiogram (EKG), which is typically done after physicians find warning signs such as chest pain or dizziness, or a family history of heart problems.

He came to Penn State from North Stafford High School in Stafford, Va., where he was rated a four-star recruit by three recruiting services.

The condition is among the most common causes of sudden death in young athletes, according to a national registry created by the Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation.

In his Tweet, Asiedu said he will still attend Penn State on a full football scholarship and “be a part of the team in every aspect.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.