ShareThis Page
Pitt football notebook: Defense shows promise early |

Pitt football notebook: Defense shows promise early

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt defensive back Damar Hamlin goes through during drills on the firs day of practice Friday, Aug. 3, 2018 UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

Through the first week of Pitt’s training camp, there is some cautious optimism growing about the potential of the defense.

“You could start to see it at the end of last year,” coach Pat Narduzzi said of the Virginia Tech and Miami games in which the opponents totaled only 607 yards.

“With some of the new stuff we’re doing, it’s giving them a little bit of an advantage. We’ve tweaked it quite a bit. It’s adding a layer of paint as far as what we’re doing defensively.”

Narduzzi, however, isn’t ready to accept excessive praise.

“To me, it’s measured in did you win a championship or not. You can have a good defense, but if you go 5-7 nobody cares. If we get to a championship game, you can talk about the defense and I’ll jump up and down.”

He admits the depth has improved.

“When you look at where we were a year ago, at linebacker especially, we had one deep,” he said. “If we had to put a backup in, you are holding onto your tail with both hands, going, ‘What’s going to happen here?’ Saying, ‘I hope they don’t run that play.’

“This year you’re not doing that. You put a backup in, you have a chance. We have more pieces to the puzzle. We have 22, maybe 25 or 26 guys (on defense) who maybe can help us win a championship.”

Freshmen put on alert

The NCAA’s new redshirt rule in which players can participate in four games without losing a year of eligibility might give some freshmen increased playing time.

“Anybody can go in,” Narduzzi said. “If you want to put a guy in, put him in. We have four games. It does change your strategy a little bit.”

Narduzzi said it also can be motivating. He said he has seen freshmen in the past “shut it down” on scout team because they didn’t believe they had a chance to play in games.

“If you shut it down (now), you won’t get those four games at the end of the year. If you turn it up and start getting better every day, you will.”

Who’s standing out

Among the freshmen who have stood out so far are wide receiver Shocky Jacques-Louis, quarterback Nick Patti, cornerback Marquis Williams and defensive end John Morgan.

Of Jacques-Louis, Narduzzi said, “Physically, he’s done some great things, and he plays fast all the time. He has not hit a wall mentally (because) he paid attention in the spring (when he was recovering from a high school injury).

“He caught a ball two days ago, and I said, ‘Whoa.’ I turned around to get some Gatorade. I didn’t think there was any way he would walk it down.”

Patti is not conceding the backup quarterback job, the coach said.

“Nick is not saying ‘OK, I’m a freshman. I’ll be the third, fourth or fifth (quarterback).’ He’s coming in and studying the game, and he’s done some positive things.”

So far, so good

Narduzzi has been knocking on wood a lot these days as he shepherds his team through the first week of training camp.

“We came in healthy. We’re still really healthy right now after six days,” he said. “That’s attributed to our offseason program and our guys paying attention to the tempo, kids starting to figure out how we practice together and keep each other healthy.”

Get the latest news about Pitt football and all things Pitt athletics.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.