ShareThis Page
Pitt, Virginia Tech ‘hungry’ for win in key ACC Coastal clash |

Pitt, Virginia Tech ‘hungry’ for win in key ACC Coastal clash

Pitt coach Pat Narduzzi reacts after his team failed to score from the 1-yard line in the final series of downs at Virginia Tech on Nov. 18 2017.

Kenny Pickett can’t escape the gobble-gobble, especially the memory it ignites. Not even when he’s at practice trying to get his mind right for Virginia Tech, the opponent for Pitt’s most significant November game since 2010.

“We’re running out to warm up and guys were mocking the turkey sound,” Pickett said. “It gives me the chills. I hate that sound.”

What else could he expect during Hokies week?

For those without access to Google, a Hokie actually is a turkey.

It was adopted as Virginia Tech’s mascot more than a century ago when the school was known as Virginia Agricultural and Mechanical College and Polytechnic Institute, shortened in 1944 to VPI, a name used only in the most formal situations. The school’s website tells the story of how a local resident named Floyd Meade trained a large turkey to pull a cart at a football game in 1913.

Now the gobble-gobble is played through the Lane Stadium loudspeakers whenever a Virginia Tech opponent faces third down or the home team scores a touchdown. You can see how it would annoy a guy such as Pickett, who passed for 242 yards during a 20-14 loss to the Hokies last year.

But Pickett could accept the gobble-gobble if that game had turned out differently. Pitt lost when it failed to score after four chances from the Hokies 1. Hall was stopped twice for no gain and for a loss of 3 yards after Pickett threw incomplete to Jester Weah on third down.

Pickett said he thinks about that game “all the time.”

“That changed our season,” he said. “You score there. You win the next week. We’re going bowling. Who knows what happens next, we win a nice bowl game? We’ve been preaching that all week.

“We all know what happened. We all remember it clearly. We talk about it. It’s extra motivation for this week.”

Pickett said coaches don’t reference it in front of the players, but coach Pat Narduzzi brought it up at the outset of his weekly news conference Monday.

He predicted Virginia Tech, which has lost two games in row, will show up at Heinz Field on Saturday “hungry, probably angry, something to prove.”

Then, he added, “I’ll have an angry and hungry Pitt football team. Still goes through my mind fourth-and-1. Four downs at the 1 last year where we could have taken that game back to Pittsburgh. We’re going to play angry, as well.”

On Thursday, however, he downplayed the importance of what happened a year ago.

“I really haven’t talked about it (with the team),” he said. “We did goal line (Wednesday). I said, ‘Hey, we have a yard to go. What are we going to do? I just kind of threw it out there.

“I don’t worry about what happened a year ago. This is a different football team.”

Given the circumstances, Pitt should not need extra motivation. Its season can go in one of two directions, depending on the outcome.

A victory means Pitt can win the ACC Coastal by winning at Wake Forest on Nov. 17. A loss gives Virginia Tech the upper hand.

The Hokies will be champions if they beat Pitt and go home and defeat Miami and Virginia at Lane Stadium, where the familiar “gobble-gobble” is appreciated more than it is in Pittsburgh.

Get the latest news about Pitt football and all things Panthers athletics.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.