Archive

ShareThis Page
Ex-Louisville coach Rick Pitino has some choice words for Pitt’s Kevin Stallings | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Ex-Louisville coach Rick Pitino has some choice words for Pitt’s Kevin Stallings

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, January 4, 2018 11:30 a.m
PittsburghLouisvilleBasketball53825jpg066f1
Pitt guard Marcus Carr fights his way around the defense of Louisville forward Deng Adel during the first half Tuesday, Jan. 2, 2018, in Louisville, Ky.
PittsburghLouisvilleBasketball95568jpg004bd
Pitt guard Shamiel Stevenson (attempts to drive past the defense of Louisville forward Malik Williams during the first half Tuesday, Jan. 2, 2018, in Louisville, Ky.
FraudChargesBasketball95196jpg68cd7
AP Photo | Timothy D. Easley
Louisville coach Rick Pitino.
PittsburghLouisvilleBasketball25950jpg6132c
Louisville forward Anas Mahmoud (left) attempts to block a shot by Pitt's guard Marcus Carr the second half.
MiamiPittsburghBasketball97397jpg6340b
Pittsburgh coach Kevin Stallings yells to his players as they take on Miami during the first half of an NCAA college basketball game Saturday, Dec. 30, 2017, in Pittsburgh. Miami won 67-53. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)

Louisville coach Rick Pitino is apparently not a fan of Kevin Stallings.

The Louisville Courier Journal reports media personality John Ramsey shared Pitino’s opinion of the University of Pittsburgh basketball coach in a tweet.

Pitino comment comes in reaction to Stallings’ heckling a fan during Pitt’s 77-51 ACC loss to Louisville on Tuesday.

Audio from the sideline appeared to catch Stallings yelling over to a Louisville fan: “At least we don’t pay our guys $100,000.”

Stallings was referencing an FBI investigation, in which Louisville is being probed for allegedly paying a recruit — later indentified as five-star recruit Brian Bowen — to sign with the school.

Pitino ended up losing his job, along with two Louisville assistants and then-athletic director Tom Jurich.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.