Miami lineman admits Hurricanes didn’t prepare well for Pitt game last season |

Miami lineman admits Hurricanes didn’t prepare well for Pitt game last season

Getty Images
MIAMI GARDENS, FL - NOVEMBER 18: Miami Hurricanes mascot Sebastian celebrates during a game against the Virginia Cavaliers at Hard Rock Stadium on November 18, 2017 in Miami Gardens, Florida. (Photo by Mike Ehrmann/Getty Images)

It appears Miami didn’t have much respect for Pitt last season.

“It was a team which we expected to go in and blow them out and win,” senior offensive lineman Tyree St. Louis said Tuesday of the 24-14 loss at Heinz Field in the No. 2 Hurricanes’ final regular-season game.

“We had faced bigger and better opponents and we had fought until the last second. The Pitt game was the main thing that stopped us.

“In no one’s mind we thought we would lose the Pitt game, but we didn’t prepare like that. So when we did lose, it kind of shocked us and set us back, saying ‘we are vulnerable, we can be beat.’

“It doesn’t matter who we beat before. If we don’t come in the game with the same mindset as past games, we are going to lose, which we did.”

After losing to Pitt, Miami ended the season on a three-game losing streak with losses to No. 1 Clemson, 38-3, in the ACC Championship Game and No. 6 Wisconsin, 34-24, in the Orange Bowl.

“We learned to just keep our foot on the gas and take nothing for granted,” senior offensive lineman Tyler Gauthier said. “We thought we were riding high, we were 10-0. We can’t do that, we got to go out there and play every game like it’s our last game and I think that’s what we’re going to do this year.”

Miami, ranked No. 8 in the Associated Press preseason poll, opens its season Sunday against No. 25 LSU at AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.