No. 14 Iowa holds on, hands Pitt 1st loss |

No. 14 Iowa holds on, hands Pitt 1st loss

The Associated Press
Iowa forward Tyler Cook grabs a rebound over Pitt forward Kene Chukwuka during the second half Tuesday. Chukwuka had nine points and three rebounds in 23 minutes.
Pitt guard Sidy N’Dir drives to the basket over Iowa guard Joe Wieskamp during the first half Tuesday, Nov. 27, 2018, in Iowa City, Iowa.
Iowa guard Isaiah Moss steals the ball from Pitt guard Trey McGowens during the second half Tuesday, Nov. 27, 2018, in Iowa City, Iowa. Iowa won 69-68.

IOWA CITY, Iowa — The first five games were a relative breeze for the 14th-ranked Iowa Hawkeyes, who unexpectedly jumped into the Top 25 after an impressive trip to New York.

Rebuilding Pitt reminded Iowa that things typically aren’t so easy against fellow high-major teams — even ones that didn’t win a conference game last season.

Freshman guard Joe Wieskamp had 18 points and 11 rebounds for his first double-double, Nicholas Baer scored 14 of his 16 points in the second half and the Hawkeyes held on 69-68 on Tuesday night for their third win over a power program this month.

Jordan Bohannon had 12 points and six steals for the Hawkeyes (6-0), who also took down Oregon and Connecticut at the 2K Classic two weeks ago in New York.

“It certainly wasn’t a thing of beauty by any means. But that’s how games are sometimes,” Iowa coach Fran McCaffery said.

A lot of that had to do with Pitt (6-1), which went 0-18 in the ACC in 2017-18.

“I see a lot of signs of encouragement. But I’m not happy we lost,” coach Jeff Capel said.

The Panthers put themselves in position for the upset — only to miss two shots in the final 10.4 seconds that would’ve given them the win.

Iowa’s Tyler Cook grabbed the rebound of a missed 3-pointer by Connor McCaffery — only to brick both ensuing free throws. Trey McGowens and Sidy N’Dir each had chances for the winning shot, with Iowa only securing the victory when N’Dir’s desperate turnaround jumper in the paint went awry.

“We were trying to get the ball to the basket,” Capel said. “Maybe get a foul, put some pressure on the defense and just make a play.”

A pair of crucial 3s by Baer helped Iowa jump ahead 64-62, capping a stretch of 11 straight points for the senior. But Kene Chukwuka pulled Pitt to 67-66 on an underneath bucket with 1:09 to go.

Freshman guard Xavier Johnson had 18 points to lead the Panthers, who face Duquesne in the City Game on Friday.

The Panthers have to be more than a little optimistic after their first performance on the road. They shot 61.3 percent in the first half at a venue they’ve never played in before and knocked Iowa’s potent offense off its rhythm for much of the night.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.