No first-teamers, but ACC honors 12 Pitt players |

No first-teamers, but ACC honors 12 Pitt players

Jerry DiPaola
Pittsburgh’s Qadree Ollison runs into Wake Forest’s secondary Saturday, Nov. 17, 2018 in Winston-Salem, N.C.

Pitt’s players and coaches have preached a team-first attitude all season, and that apparently proved true Monday when the All-ACC team was released. The Panthers won the ACC Coastal championship, without even one first-team player.

But a total of 12 Pitt guys were either second- or third-team or honorable mention selections. The voting panel was comprised of the conference head coaches, a member of each school’s radio broadcast team and select media members.

Senior running back Qadree Ollison, who is second in the ACC in rushing yards (1,134), and offensive left tackle Stefano Millin, a graduate transfer senior from Kent State, were chosen to the second team.

Senior Darrin Hall, who shared the tailback position with Ollison and rushed for 935 yards, was named to the third team, along with senior guard Mike Herndon, sophomore center Jimmy Morrissey and sophomore kicker Alex Kessman, who hit 10 of his 13 field-goal attempts.

Six Panthers received honorable mention honors, including junior wide receiver Maurice Ffrench, who was named as an all-purpose player and returner. Ffrench returned two kickoffs for touchdowns.

Also honored were senior fullback George Aston, senior tackle Alex Bookser, senior guard Connor Dintino (now starting at guard in place of the injured Morrissey), junior cornerback Dane Jackson and junior safety Damar Hamlin.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.