Pitt basketball faces first major test of season at Iowa |

Pitt basketball faces first major test of season at Iowa

Iowa forward Luka Garza (55) shoots over Alabama State guard AJ Farrar (13) during the first half of an NCAA college basketball game Wednesday, Nov. 21, 2018, in Iowa City, Iowa. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)

When Pitt defeated Saint Louis last week in a Barclays Classic game that tipped off at noon in Brooklyn, N.Y., there were 355 people in the stands.

Pitt (6-0) played well and won 75-73 against Saint Louis, which has been projected to win the Atlantic 10 this season.

Coach Jeff Capel was pleased, but he also realizes a tougher opponent awaits Tuesday night in Iowa City, Iowa, where Pitt will confront No. 14 Iowa in its first game in front of a hostile crowd.

“I’m interested to see how they are in this environment,” he said. “This will be a packed house. None of our guys have been in this type of environment for a while, and this team hasn’t.”

Iowa (5-0) will test Pitt on several levels, most notably its inexperience. Pitt will start three freshman, and Iowa has returned all five starters from last year.

Also, the Hawkeyes, who are averaging 88.6 points, will be difficult to handle off the glass. Tyler Cook (6-foot-9) and Luke Garza (6-11) are averaging 16 points each. Pitt’s tallest starter is Kene Chukwuka (6-9) who is averaging six rebounds in an average of only 22.3 minutes.

But Pitt has found a way to win its first six games by doing the things that make coaches smile.

“I learned we can beat a good opponent in a neutral place being away from home,” Capel said of the victory against Saint Louis. “We showed toughness. We made tough plays, whether it was finally getting a rebound, stepping up and taking a charge, making free throws down the stretch, following the game plan.”

He said guard Sidy N’Dir played his best game “by far,” scoring 13 points in 26 minutes off the bench.

Capel is happy with the progress his team is making early in the season, but when he heard Pitt is No. 23 in the NCAA’s new NET rankings, he scoffed — mainly because he never had heard of it.

“I have no clue what that is,” he said. “I don’t pay attention to rankings in November. It think they’re all off.”

For what it’s worth, NET ranks Pitt ahead of Arizona (No. 33), Villanova (38) and Kentucky (61) and only eight spots behind Iowa (15).

Likewise, senior guard Jared Wilson-Frame has more interest in how his younger teammates are reacting to their first collegiate experience than any new metrics.

He said he doesn’t expect them to be in awe of the Iowa experience, and he believes they will handle it in the proper manner.

“The one thing I like about our freshmen and all our new players is they actually want to know how it is,” he said. “They ask the important questions of what is it going to be like and what to expect.

“We just tell them, ‘You’re a basketball player. You’re a good basketball player. You excel at this level, so just calm down, trust yourself, trust your instincts. You live for this. This is the moment you thought about getting into before you decided to play here. This is the stuff you want to do.’ “

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.