Pitt center Randall rebounds from injury |

Pitt center Randall rebounds from injury

Pitt forward Derrick Randall puts up a shot while being defended by Chaminade guard Kiran Shastri (left) and forward Michael Louder (right) in the second half Monday, Nov. 24, 2014, in Lahaina, Hawaii.

LAHAINA, Hawaii — He has been a mere afterthought among Pitt’s litany of injuries that has sidelined senior guard Cameron Wright and delayed freshman Ryan Luther’s college debut.

For Derrick Randall, his breakout performance Monday against Chaminade in the EA Sports Maui Invitational couldn’t have come soon enough.

Randall scored 11 points and grabbed a career-high and tournament-record 21 rebounds in Pitt’s 81-68 victory. The Panthers faced No. 15 San Diego State on Tuesday night.

More importantly, Randall — at least for one game — appeared to solidify a starting center position that junior Joseph Uchebo may have let slip away.

Granted, Randall registered his career rebound game against a Division II opponent whose frontline was dwarfed in comparison to his 6-foot-9, 240-pound frame. He outrebounded the entire Chaminade team.

Randall was relatively healthy after struggling the past month with a lingering ankle injury he suffered in a preseason scrimmage.

“It’s been a frustrating time for me, the ankle injury,” Pitt coach Jamie Dixon said. “He was playing really well, had the ankle injury in the Blue-Gold game. It’s about a month that he’s been full speed and sat out for two or three weeks. It’s finally getting back.”

Dixon said injuries delayed the development of some of the team’s younger and less experienced players. Randall, for example, appeared in all 36 games but averaged only 8.6 minutes last season.

“We’ve just got to get guys healthy and get them right,” Dixon said. “And (Randall’s) one of them as well. (Luther) was out for a week (foot injury). Now he’s back, so we’re playing him and he’s giving us more minutes. We’re finding different guys and trying to get them back to 100 percent.”

After giving Uchebo the quick hook following a missed layup and turnover in the opening minute against Chaminade, Dixon played Randall 13 minutes in the first half and 30 minutes overall. A transfer from Rutgers, Randall’s previous career high was 25 minutes.

Randall immediately took up residence inside, scoring six points and grabbing 13 rebounds in the first half (including eight offensive boards). His commanding presence created second shots for teammates who, in turn, began passing him the ball.

“It was really impressive and good to see Derrick rebound like that,” junior point guard James Robinson said. “In practice, he’s one of the louder guys. He always gives his all. It was really good to see and hopefully he can continue.”

Randall’s track record isn’t that of a scorer or dominant rebounder. Dixon, though, was impressed enough by Randall’s performance against Chaminade.

“He’s played better in practice in the last week. I think it was important,” Dixon said. “As disappointed as we were on Friday in our performance (after losing to Hawaii), we really wanted to get our legs under us.

“I just felt like we were tired when we got here. Hopefully now we’re getting our legs under us a little bit. Derrick is getting healthier now. It’s good to see him go like that.”

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.