Archive

Pitt gets verbal commitment from Virginia LB | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Pitt gets verbal commitment from Virginia LB

Jerry DiPaola

Pitt landed its sixth recruit from the Class of 2016 on Monday when linebacker Chase Pine of Williamsburg, Va., said he plans to enroll.

The competition for Pine was intense.

“Pitt did the best job recruiting him,” said Andy Linn, Pine’s coach at Lafayette High School. “Coach (Rob) Harley (linebacker coach) did a phenomenal job. He built a relationship with Chase from the get-go. He was honest with him. I think that was one of the biggest things.”

Pine, ranked as a three-star prospect by Rivals.com, had offers from several Power 5 schools, including California, Georgia, North Carolina, North Carolina State, Syracuse, Virginia, Virginia Tech, Wake Forest and West Virginia.

“There also is a good chance of him playing sooner (at Pitt),” Linn said.

Pine, who will be Lafayette’s starting quarterback this season, was one of the team’s top defensive playmakers last season when Lafayette (14-1) advanced to the 3A state title game. At 6-3 12, 220 pounds, Pine had eight sacks and two interceptions, one for a touchdown, in five playoff games, competing in Virginia’s third-largest of six classifications.

“He makes big plays and he is able to get to the passer and also is able to cover,” Linn said.

Pine is the first 2016 linebacker to commit to Pitt.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.