Archive

ShareThis Page
Pitt prepares for speedy Miami with bowl eligibility on the line | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Pitt prepares for speedy Miami with bowl eligibility on the line

ptrpittmiami01113013
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Jason Hendricks gets blocked by Miami's Ereck Flowers (74) as Tracy Howard runs for a first-quarter touchdown Friday, Nov. 29, 2013, at Heinz Field.

Pitt coach Paul Chryst said he watched only two plays of Miami’s 30-13 loss to Virginia.

“I wanted to enjoy the rest of the night,” he said.

Chryst saw enough of Miami on Sunday and Monday during extensive video review while he and his staff and players prepare for the biggest game of his three-year tenure at Pitt.

Pitt must defeat the Hurricanes (6-5, 3-4) at 7 p.m. Saturday to qualify for a bowl game. A loss will end Pitt’s worst season since the 5-7 finish in 2007.

Pitt (5-6, 3-4) was in this position two years ago — Chryst’s first season — taking a 4-6 record into the final two games. Pitt won twice, defeating Rutgers and South Florida in its final season in the Big East.

But Miami, even after its surprising loss to Virginia, presents a bigger threat to Pitt than those 2012 opponents. After all, the Hurricanes almost turned college football upside-down Nov. 15 when they nearly upset undefeated Florida State, losing 30-26 in the final three minutes.

Speed on both sides of the football sets Miami apart from many teams. Pitt discovered that last year when it allowed the Hurricanes to average 17.4 yards per reception in a 41-31 loss at Heinz Field. Wide receiver Stacy Coley, who is now a sophomore, recorded scoring plays of 32, 34 and 73 yards.

Miami won five national championships between 1983-2001 but has been nationally ranked only three times since joining the ACC in 2004.

Pitt senior safety Ray Vinopal still respects the Hurricanes.

“They play with confidence. They play with that swag,” he said.

Yet, he believes Pitt can counteract Miami’s play-making ability by playing smart.

“We have to come to play,” Vinopal said. “I think we can match up well, but it’s going to be depending on what (Pitt) team shows up.”

Pitt’s defense ranked fourth nationally at one point before the schedule toughened and the Panthers allowed 1,050 yards in three games before recovering against a weak Syracuse team Saturday.

“Obviously, you hear from the outside, ‘It was Syracuse. Their offense isn’t good,’ ” Vinopal said.

“But the bottom line is if guys are in their spot, they are in their spot. When guys aren’t in their spot, that’s when teams make plays. If the team shows up that has the guys in the spots they need to be in, we are going to be fine.”

Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.