Young scores 27 points in Pitt’s win over Division II Chaminade |

Young scores 27 points in Pitt’s win over Division II Chaminade

Pitt forward Ryan Luther (4) attempts to block a shot by Chaminade guard Kevin Hu (23) in the first half Monday, Nov. 24, 2014, in Lahaina, Hawaii.
Pitt forward Ryan Luther (4) controls a rebound as his teammate James Robinson, ducks out of the way in the first half against Chaminade on Monday, Nov. 24, 2014, in Lahaina, Hawaii.
Pitt fans cheer on their team against Chaminade in the first half Monday, Nov. 24, 2014, in Lahaina, Hawaii.
Chaminade forward Frankie Eteuati (25) dunks and is fouled by Pitt guard Chris Jones (12) in the first half Monday, Nov. 24, 2014, in Lahaina, Hawaii.
Chaminade guard David Ware (left) passes the ball as Pitt coach Jamie Dixon reacts wanting a traveling call on Ware in the first half Monday, Nov. 24, 2014, in Lahaina, Hawaii.
Chaminade guard Lee Bailey (5) passes the ball and fouls Pitt forward Derrick Randall (11) n the second half Monday, Nov. 24, 2014, in Lahaina, Hawaii.
Pitt forward Derrick Randall puts up a shot while being defended by Chaminade guard Kiran Shastri (left) and forward Michael Louder (right) in the second half Monday, Nov. 24, 2014, in Lahaina, Hawaii.

LAHAINA, Hawaii — The threat of an upset always is a possibility at the Maui Invitational with Division II Chaminade in the mix.

The Silverswords upset Texas in the tournament’s first round two years ago. And who could forget the granddaddy of all upsets when Chaminade shocked Ralph Sampson and Virginia in 1982?

Armed with this knowledge — and coming off a surprising upset loss against Hawaii three days earlier — Pitt blew the doors off Chaminade in a much-needed 81-68 victory Monday night at Lahaina Civic Center.

Pitt (3-1) advances to face the BYU-San Diego State winner at 10 p.m. Tuesday on ESPN.

“The loss hurt, it hurt a lot,” said sophomore forward Michael Young, who achieved career highs with 27 points and 15 points as he also collected his first career double-double.

“You don’t want to lose a game you’re supposed to win. I don’t think we had a lot of energy in the Hawaii game.”

“I think the Hawaii game was a wake-up call or them,” Chaminade coach Eric Bovaird said. “They came out inspired, aggressive. They were in the passing lanes. They were crashing the boards.”

Young and senior Derrick Randall dominated Chaminade’s undernourished frontcourt with rebounding and inside force. Randall scored 11 points and grabbed a tournament-record 21 rebounds. The pair outrebounded Chaiminade, 36-17.

“Derrick was unbelievable tonight,” Pitt coach Jamie Dixon said. “He’s played better in practice the last week. Let him play when he’s doing what he’s doing.”

Their latest opponent actually was irrelevant to the Panthers, who were fighting against themselves — both offensively and defensively.

After a slow start, Pitt took charge.

Chaminade led 18-17, and it looked like the Hawaii game all over again as the Panthers failed to finish scoring opportunities and were a step behind defensively.

Freshman Ryan Luther (Hampton) turned things around with a long 3-pointer that sparked an 8-0 run featuring aggressive defense.

Sophomore guard Josh Newkirk created havoc at the defensive end, securing a loose ball and scoring a transition basket to make it 23-17. The play seemed to energize the Panthers, who still were attempting to shake loose the cobwebs against a team they were expected to defeat with one hand tied behind their backs.

Until that stretch, Chaminade (2-1) kept pace with the Panthers. However, it was a different game from that point as Pitt built a 42-31 lead at halftime.

Pitt junior guard James Robinson added 17 points, four rebounds and five assists.

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.