Archive

ShareThis Page
West Virginia, Texas football hold Strong ties | TribLIVE.com
WVU

West Virginia, Texas football hold Strong ties

ptrWVUFB21110214
Steph Chambers | Trib Total Media
West Virginia cornerback Daryl Worley breaks up a pass intended for TCU receiver Kolby Listenbee on Saturday, Nov. 1, 2014, in Morgantown, W.Va.
458256872
Getty Images
Texas coach Charlie Strong looks on during a game against Texas Tech on Saturday, Nov. 1, 2014, in Lubbock, Texas. The Longhorns won, 34-13.
ptrWVUFB21110214
Steph Chambers | Trib Total Media
West Virginia cornerback Daryl Worley breaks up a pass intended for TCU receiver Kolby Listenbee on Saturday, Nov. 1, 2014, in Morgantown, W.Va.
458256872
Getty Images
Texas coach Charlie Strong looks on during a game against Texas Tech on Saturday, Nov. 1, 2014, in Lubbock, Texas. The Longhorns won, 34-13.

Unlike his relationships with several coaches in the Big 12, Dana Holgorsen shares no bloodlines or coaching trees with Charlie Strong.

But the West Virginia coach and his Texas counterpart still have a connection: the Big East.

The Mountaineers’ last season in the Big East, 2011, was Holgorsen’s first as coach. Strong at the time was turning Louisville into a Big East power that would join the ACC in 2013. He parlayed his success into the Texas job, replacing Mack Brown during the offseason.

“I’m very familiar with him, obviously,” Holgorsen said. “We’re pretty familiar with how he runs his program — very disciplined. He’s a no-nonsense guy. I’ve got a ton of respect for that.”

Strong dismissed nine players in September for a variety of infractions. Shortly thereafter, beleaguered NFL commissioner Roger Goodell met with Strong to get his thoughts on player discipline. The aptly named Strong likes to work out and pump iron and has yelled at his players, “Don’t let this 53-year-old man outwork you.”

The offense-oriented Holgorsen and Strong, a Lou Holtz disciple known as a defensive guru, faced off once in the Big East, on Nov. 5, 2011, in Morgantown, W.Va.

Louisville won 35-31 as quarterback Teddy Bridgewater, who now starts for the Minnesota Vikings, completed 21 of 26 passes for 246 yards, one touchdown and one interception. The biggest star, however, was WVU quarterback Geno Smith, who formerly started for the New York Jets. Smith was 31 of 44 for 410 yards and three TDs and no picks.

After the game, the Louisville players were heard singing “Country Roads,” WVU’s unofficial theme song, in the visitor’s locker room.

The loss led to WVU finishing 5-2 in the Big East, the same as Louisville and Cincinnati. Even though Louisville beat the Mountaineers, it could not beat Pitt, and a three-way tie breaker sent WVU to the Orange Bowl.

Strong’s Cardinals finished 7-6 in 2011 and went a combined 23-3 the next two seasons, beating Florida in the Sugar Bowl in January 2013.

Brown stuck around for 16 years, but the program had slipped, especially recruiting. Strong, with his forceful personality, is addressing that.

But this has been a bumpy season, starting with the dismissals. On the other hand, the Longhorns might be coming to life, especially their defense.

Said Holgorsen, “It’s a very good, quality team that’s improving on a week-to-week basis.”

Bob Cohn is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at bcohn@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.