ShareThis Page
Mark Madden: It’s best Jaromir Jagr finishes career elsewhere |

Mark Madden: It’s best Jaromir Jagr finishes career elsewhere

FILE - In this Nov. 25, 2017, file photo, Calgary Flames right wing Jaromir Jagr, of the Czech Republic, waits for a face-off against the Colorado Avalanche during the second period of an NHL hockey game in Denver. Multiple people with direct knowledge of the move say the Calgary Flames have placed Jagr on waivers. The people spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity Sunday, Jan. 28, 2018, because the team had not announced the transaction. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski, File)

Jaromir Jagr’s NHL career is finally over after 1,733 games, 766 goals, 1,921 points and $135 million.

For Jagr, that last figure counts most.

Jagr, 45, will continue his career in his native Czech Republic. He cleared NHL waivers and has been loaned to a club in Kladno, his hometown.

That team plays in Czech hockey’s second division and is owned by Jagr. Conflict between Jagr and management should be minimal.

Some misguided locals think the Penguins should have acquired Jagr. Many of them doubtless booed Jagr every time he touched the puck when he played for the visiting team at Mellon Arena or PPG Paints Arena.

GM Jim Rutherford wasn’t interested. Smart man.

All the tickets are sold. So there was no good reason to indulge a nostalgia trip at the risk of sabotaging the Penguins’ bid for a third consecutive Stanley Cup.

Jagr’s ability finally has eroded below an acceptable level.

This season, Jagr had one goal and six assists in 22 games with Calgary.

When Gordie Howe was 45, he had 31 goals and 69 assists in 70 games with Houston of the World Hockey Association and was league MVP. The WHA wasn’t the NHL, but Howe later scored 15 goals in the NHL when he was 51.

Jagr has more NHL points than Howe. But Howe lasted longer and played at a more productive level deeper into his old age.

Jagr isn’t good enough to play in the NHL now. Every NHL team had a shot at Jagr and his very affordable $1 million salary via waivers. All passed.

Jagr would have been an especially bad fit in Pittsburgh.

Jagr only plays right wing, and the Penguins have at least three who are clearly better. Jagr can’t play fourth line. He doesn’t have the grit or humility.

On the power play, Jagr only plays the right half-wall. That’s where Evgeni Malkin plays, and Sidney Crosby rotates there from down low. The Penguins power play is converting 27.1 percent of the time, making it the NHL’s best. No need for help. Not much room for improvement.

Jagr has a selfish bent, as mercenaries often do.

That boiled over a bit in Calgary, where he undermined coach Glen Gulutzan. Not to a damaging or even distracting level. But he wanted his line’s style to be designed around him. That worked back when. Not at 45.

Jagr is one of hockey’s all-time best. He has the stats. He passed the eye test. No one was tougher to knock off the puck. A lengthier tribute will follow when Jagr ceases playing hockey anywhere. Perhaps the Penguins will retire his No. 68, or bring Jagr to Pittsburgh to be honored at a game.

Jagr played for nine NHL teams during his career and in the Russia-based KHL. Jagr played 11 seasons for the Penguins. His next-longest stay was four years with the New York Rangers.

Does all that wandering dilute his legacy? Does Jagr really have a jersey, especially given his uneven relationship with Pittsburgh since leaving? Teasing a return in 2011 and then signing with Philadelphia didn’t help.

The “Traveling Jagrs” are a group of fans who go to games wearing all Jagr’s different jerseys. They look silly, not least because there’s so many of them.

There’s no doubting Jagr’s greatness.

But it’s a strange kind of great. It’s been a strange kind of career.

It’s good that it’s not wrapping up with one last run as a Penguin.

Mark Madden hosts a radio show 3-6 p.m. weekdays on WXDX-FM (105.9).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.