Tim Benz: Penguins’ Derick Brassard, Riley Sheahan must pay dividends now |

Tim Benz: Penguins’ Derick Brassard, Riley Sheahan must pay dividends now

Tim Benz

This is why it’s good he is here.

More than solid two-way play. Or good playoff production. Or forcing tough matchup problems for the opposing team’s defensive depth.

This is why you should’ve been celebrating like crazy when the Penguins got Derick Brassard from the Ottawa Senators before the trade deadline.

Not fretting because Ian Cole went to Columbus or because your Ryan Reaves jersey suddenly was out of fashion.

As you read here after the deal was consummated , the greatest benefit of acquiring Brassard was the Penguins now had a capable offensive center to cushion the blow if Sidney Crosby or Evgeni Malkin got hurt.

Well, now Malkin is hurt.

How badly? We don’t know. Mike Sullivan is giving the usual “day-to-day with a lower-body injury” description.

But to hear Brassard talk, he’s speaking as a player who is preparing for a long haul up the depth chart.

“It’s not what we wanted, losing one of those two guys,” Brassard said. “Losing a guy that scored almost 100 points and 40 goals, you can’t replace that. We are all going to have to step up and play some big minutes and play different roles.”

If that sounds foreboding, I’ll balance it out with the news that Malkin was around the practice facility without a boot, crutches or an overwhelming limp .

More good news is Brassard seems to have clicked on a line with Bryan Rust and Conor Sheary. At times during the latter stages of the first-round victory over the Flyers, Sullivan referred to that line as the best on his team.

“We’re going to try to be difference-makers in the next series.” Brassard said. “We’ve had some really good looks and really good scoring chances.”

While struggling a bit in Game 6, that line excelled in Game 5. It accounted for one of the Penguins’ two goals when Sheary and Brassard set up Rust. Brassard ended up with eight shots on goal and won 9 of 12 faceoffs.

“We’ve really liked that line since we put it together,” Sullivan said. “They’ve had a lot of scoring chances five-on-five.”

There’s an added benefit of that line coalescing. It allows Riley Sheahan to bump up to play in Malkin’s spot with Phil Kessel and Carl Hagelin.

Sheahan centering a line with Kessel is something that seemed to work nicely before Brassard was acquired. During Game 6 in Philadelphia, that line connected for a goal before Claude Giroux knocked out Hagelin.

Elevating a fourth-line center to that capacity might seem extreme. But the Penguins always have viewed Sheahan’s skill set to be higher than his standing on the depth chart. So much so that if they didn’t execute the Brassard deal, they might have been content to keep Sheahan as their third-line center given the way he was performing leading up to the trade deadline.

“I just try to make space for them. Use my body. Get to the net,” said the 6-foot-3, 222-pound Sheahan. “Just be ready to make some plays because they (Hagelin and Kessel) are offensive-minded guys. So you just try to get open for them and create opportunities.”

In 73 regular-season games with the Penguins, Sheahan scored 11 times and totaled 32 points. He had just two goals and 13 points in Detroit last season over 80 games. He had a goal and two assists in the Flyers series.

“(Promoting Sheahan) was an obvious option for us when we didn’t have (Malkin) in Game 6,” explained Sullivan. “Riley brings a 200-foot game. He gets in on pucks. That helps a guy like Phil (Kessel).

“We didn’t want to change (Brassard’s) line if we didn’t have to. So for those reasons we opted to put Riley with Phil and keep Brassard’s line together, and we’ve liked what we’ve seen from both.”

It always has been my contention that the best part about acquiring Brassard would be something we all hoped we wouldn’t have to see. That’s him being a human insurance policy in case of injury to Malkin or Crosby.

At least for the short term, that policy might pay off.

The additional coverage from Sheahan will help, too.

Malkin might not miss a game against Washington. If he misses the whole series, frankly, the Penguins probably will lose.

But Brassard and Sheahan are good enough — and are now fitting in well enough — that the Penguins should be able to stay afloat through at least the first four games if Malkin is sidelined that long.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @TimBenzPGH.

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Riley Sheahan plays against the Capitals Sunday, Feb. 2, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.
Getty Images
Lars Eller of the Capitals is checked by Jamie Oleksiak of the Penguins on Feb. 2, 2018.
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Zach Aston-Reese attempts to shoot the puck in front of goal during their game against the Flyers inside of PPG Paints Arena on April 20, 2018.
Getty Images
The Penguins' Derick Brassard and the Flyers' Brandon Manning fight for the puck in Game 4 on April 18, 2018, in Philadelphia.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.