Penguins reportedly looking to trade Phil Kessel |
Breakfast With Benz

Penguins reportedly looking to trade Phil Kessel

Tim Benz
Getty Images
Phil Kessel of the Penguins has the puck stolen by T.J. Oshie of the Capitals during the third period in Game 5 in the second round of the playoffs Saturday, May 5, 2018, in Washington.

The Penguins are reportedly trying to trade Phil Kessel, according to 105.9 FM’s Mark Madden.

Madden made the statement on his 105.9 FM radio show yesterday.

According to Madden, the Penguins are going to try to move Kessel to another team this offseason, and “Kessel is OK with that.”

As Madden phrased it, “the key word is try.” He couched the chances of a potential deal happening because of Kessel’s $6.8 million price tag and his reputation of being a hard player to coach.

Madden cited “sources close to the Penguins and to Phil Kessel.” His explanation for Kessel’s endorsement of a potential trade stems from two points.

The first of which is Kessel’s alleged displeasure over the fact that he hasn’t been able to play on a line with Evgeni Malkin full-time, instead being used as the balancing point for head coach Mike Sullivan to spread his top talent over three scoring lines.

The second is “underlying dissatisfaction” between Kessel and Sullivan.

Madden didn’t mention any specific trade targets in terms of others teams or reported players coming back in return.

The Penguins winger has played in Pittsburgh the last three years and has won two Stanley Cups. He hasn’t missed a game since 2010 when he played in Toronto. Kessel apparently played through injury last year, some believe to the detriment of his game in the name of that “Ironman” streak.

Kessel posted 34 goals and a career high 92 points. But he was a shadow of himself in the postseason, scoring just once in 12 games.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.