Diamondbacks reliever admits to soiling himself before an outing |
Breakfast With Benz

Diamondbacks reliever admits to soiling himself before an outing

Tim Benz
Getty Images
Diamondbacks reliever Archie Bradley delivers a pitch in the eighth inning against the Milwaukee Brewers at Chase Field on May 15, 2018 in Phoenix.

Is this a case of reliever relief?

Arizona Diamondbacks relief pitcher Archie Bradley soiled himself moments before going into a game.

Sorry. I can’t really write around it and properly tell the story. He then pitched with his pants containing the excrement.

And a pleasant good morning to you as well!

Bradley revealed the story on a Yahoo! Sports podcast. The incident occurred during warmups as he was about to enter a game earlier this season.

“Right before I’m about to go in the game, I pooped my pants,” Bradley admitted. “I know I’m a pitch away from going in the game, so I’m scrambling to clean myself up. I get it cleaned up the best I can, button my pants up, and our bullpen coach Mike Fetters says, ‘Hey, you’re in the game.’ So I’m jogging into the game to pitch with poop in my pants essentially.

“It was the most uncomfortable I’ve ever been on the mound. And I actually had a good inning. I had a clean inning, and I walked in the dugout and I was like, ‘Guys, I just (expletive) myself.’ ”

Strange. I bet most Pirates fans have the same reaction any time one of their bullpen pitchers comes into a game as well.

By the way, did he really just say he had a “clean inning?” Please tell me after that “clean inning” all he got were fist bumps and high fives. No pats on the backside I hope.

You may have seen Bradley’s mention of Fetters as his bullpen coach. Fetters was a relief pitcher in Pittsburgh for some awful Pirates clubs ‘in 2001 and 2002. I bet he thought cleaning up messes for those teams was going to be as bad as it got in his career.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.