ShareThis Page
Making a case for Bryce Harper to the Pirates? Get real. |
Breakfast With Benz

Making a case for Bryce Harper to the Pirates? Get real.

Tim Benz
| Wednesday, December 19, 2018 9:27 a.m
Washington Nationals' Bryce Harper (34) reacts after he struck out looking during the eighth inning of a baseball game against the Toronto Blue Jays in Toronto on Saturday, June 16, 2018. (Frank Gunn/The Canadian Press via AP)

Oops. I’m sorry. I must have misread. I thought a national publication took the time to post a story suggesting there was merit to the discussion of the Pirates signing free agent superstar Bryce Harper.

Oh, wait. I didn’t misread. This actually happened.

USA Today did a deep dive into the “logic” of the Pirates making a run at signing Bryce Harper.

Their time would’ve been better spent outlining how the Pirates are preparing the defense of PNC Park against an alien invasion, calling for sasquatch appreciation night on the promotional calendar, or demanding the construction of a Derek Bell statue between Roberto Clemente’s and Willie Stargell’s.

It appears that author Gabe Lacques — who has a blue check on Twitter — is going team-by-team, giving the pros and cons of each MLB market chasing baseball’s most-prized free agent.

As if cons exist anywhere.

I’m not sure what order he is going in. The last team he wrote about in the sweepstakes was the Mariners. And it appears the Pirates are the 22nd team to get the spotlight on it, after Seattle. So maybe he’s going in descending order of likelihood.

Who will the 23rd team be? The Rockford Peaches? The Springfield Isotopes? Because I give either of them a better shot.

The most striking lines from the story — which is far more clinical and sincerely presented than I expected — are these:

“Is it also the definition of insanity to not do the same thing over and over, and expect a different result? … One thing hasn’t changed: The Pirates ignoring the high-end free agent market.”

True. But failing to bid on Harper isn’t what I needed to make that realization. I could’ve told you that when — oh, let’s see, pick one — they didn’t even bother making a serious attempt to keep J.A. Happ after 2015.

The thinking behind a lot of Lacques’ points is sound. The Pirates have a hole in the outfield. Their remaining payroll is low. Their profits are greater than what’s been reasonably reinvested into the team. They are almost four decades removed from a World Series and overdue to have a superstar and legit buzz around the team.

But they aren’t signing Bryce Harper. Reading this just made the obvious reality of that situation more frustrating.

There’s a better chance of the Steelers starting Mason Rudolph Sunday in New Orleans, or the Penguins putting Sidney Crosby in goal tonight against Washington.

Don’t get any ideas, Sid. That was sarcasm.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.