ShareThis Page
St. Joe’s routs Duquesne with fast start |

St. Joe’s routs Duquesne with fast start

| Wednesday, January 15, 2014 9:03 p.m
Saint Joseph's Halil Kanacevic goes after the ball against Duquesne's Dominique McKoy in the first half Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2014, in Philadelphia.
Saint Joseph's Chris Wilson (center) passes the ball past Duquesne's Micah Mason during the first half Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2014, in Philadelphia.
Saint Joseph's Papa Ndao (right) and Halil Kanacevic (left) double-team Duquesne's Dominique McKoy during the first half Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2014, in Philadelphia.

PHILADELPHIA — If you’re Duquesne and looking for positives, the Dukes’ second-half resolve against Saint Joseph’s is something on which to build.

On the other hand, not even outscoring St. Joe’s by 25 points after halftime was enough for a victory as Duquesne couldn’t overcome a first-half onslaught in an 84-75 loss to the Hawks on Wednesday night.

St. Joe’s (11-5, 2-1 Atlantic 10), playing without second-leading scorer Ronald Roberts (back) for the second straight game, led by as many as 37 points in a startling first half that saw the Hawks make 71.4 percent (20 of 28) of their field goals, including 66.7 percent (12 of 18) of their 3-pointers, on the way to a 52-20 halftime lead.

The Dukes (8-7, 1-2) played until the final whistle and outscored St. Joe’s, 55-32, in the second half, though much of that came against the Hawks’ reserves.

“We said (at halftime), ‘Where are we going to go from here? Are we going to pack it in and quit? Are we going to show colors like that? Or are we going to fight?’ ” Duquesne coach Jim Ferry said. “I thought the kids really fought in the second half.

“We’re not going to pat ourselves on the back.”

It would be hard to do that after the opening half. St. Joe’s, led by Langston Galloway’s 24 first-half points and six 3-pointers, was making anything and everything in sight. The Dukes didn’t help matters by going 6 for 27 from the field with nine turnovers on their offensive end in a forgettable opening half.

“It was a blitzkrieg, and us not being able to score made it worse,” Ferry said. “We got jumped. They did a great job, and we couldn’t stop them. They couldn’t miss, and we couldn’t buy a basket and the whole thing started to snowball.”

Galloway finished with a game-high 26 points while the Hawks ended with a season-best 17 3-pointers, which was three shy of tying the school record.

Derrick Colter and Jerry Jones each had 14 points to pace the Dukes, who lost their second straight contest following a five-game winning streak stopped with Saturday’s 75-56 home loss to La Salle.

Ovie Soko and Dominique McKoy also reached double figures, with 10 points apiece.

“We have to get better,” Ferry said. “We have to learn from every game. We have to become a little more efficient offensively, and we have to play with a tougher disposition on the road defensively. We let St. Joe’s feel a little too comfortable to start the game.”

Ferry said his players didn’t take consolation from the strong second half.

“They’re highly disappointed,” Ferry said. “To come in here and get jumped like that, guys are highly disappointed. It’s still a long year, a long A-10 season. We have to get better. That’s the goal.”

Aaron Bracy is a freelance writer.

Categories: Duquesne
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.