Archive

ShareThis Page
Four Downs: Jeff Driskel joins list of unknown or overmatched QBs Steelers face in finales | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Four Downs: Jeff Driskel joins list of unknown or overmatched QBs Steelers face in finales

Chris Adamski
| Saturday, December 29, 2018 12:21 p.m
579358502953de2c7e99ca6c473984fbd8385747df28
Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Jeff Driskel (6) is sacked by Denver Broncos outside linebacker Von Miller (58) in the second half of an NFL football game, Sunday, Dec. 2, 2018, in Cincinnati. (AP Photo/Gary Landers)

1.Another no-name

Jeff Driskel, meet Thaddeus Lewis and Austin Davis and Seneca Wallace. Welcome to the club of no-name quarterbacks of teams playing out the proverbial string that the Pittsburgh Steelers face in a season finale.

The Steelers will face Driskel – a 2016 sixth-round pick who’s making his fifth career start – Sunday when they hope to close out their 2018 regular season with a win against the Cincinnati Bengals. Over the past two decades, the Steelers have been sensational in Week 17 games going 16-2 since 2000. That’s remarkable, even if 16 of those 18 opponents were non-playoff teams.

An unusual common thread between almost all of these final regular-season opponents has been that they’ve often been led by almost-comically unknown or overmatched quarterbacks. For example, in each of the past three and four of the past five Steelers Week 17 games, the opposing quarterback never made another NFL start. Driskel, playing only because of an injury to Andy Dalton, could well join that group.

Dalton in 2014 is the only opposing quarterback among the past 12 the Steelers have faced in Week 17 that was his team’s starter when the season began. Since 2002, only Drew Bledsoe (2003), Joe Harrington (2005), Carson Palmer (2007) and Dalton (2014) have been a starting quarterback for a finale against the Steelers who started the opener that year and the season after. Since 2000, only Palmer and Dalton went on to be NFL starters for as many as two more seasons. Ten of the 18 had eight or fewer career starts after their Week 17 Steelers matchups.

The quarterbacks to beat the Steelers in a season finale since the turn of the century? Both are unheralded Ravens – Anthony Wright (2003) and Troy Smith (2007). There were once-proud veterans on their final legs (Bledsoe; Jeff Blake, 2002), colossal draft busts (Ryan Leaf, 2000; Tim Couch, 2001; Harrington) – and someone fits somewhere in the middle of those two categories, Robert Griffin III (2016). And don’t forget the eminently-forgettable likes of DeShone Kizer (2017), Jason Campbell (2013) and Colt McCoy (2010). At least Bruce Gradkowski (2008) is a Pittsburgh native and future Steeler.

2. Penalty flip

Remember when the Steelers were being killed by penalties? When they lead the NFL in times being flagged and yardage penalized – by a sizable margin – during September? Well, the script has flipped.

During each the Steelers’ past seven games, opponents have been assessed more penalties and penalty yardage than the Steelers. This, after the opposite was true for six of the Steelers’ first eight games.

Whereas the Steelers were an almost-unfathomable net minus-216 yards in penalty differential through Week 8, since the net has been an even moreso incredible plus-345. The former would rank the Steelers fifth-worst over a full season; the latter would by far be the NFL’s best over the full season.

Even after the horrible start to the season, the Steelers have climbed all the way back up to seventh in the NFL in penalty yardage differential (plus-124).

3. No meaningless games here

The Steelers haven’t had a losing season since 2003, and they’ve made the playoffs 11 of the 15 seasons since. And while the odds aren’t in the Steelers’ favor to qualify for the postseason this year, at least there’s a chance – they’ll kick off Sunday at Heinz Field still alive for a playoff berth.

That’s significant because it continues a trend – the Steelers simply don’t play a lot of “meaningless” games in which they’ve been eliminated from playoff contention. Since Ben Roethlisberger entered the league in 2004, they’ve only had two: the 2006 and 2012 finales. Even in non-playoff seasons 2009 and 2013, the Steelers walked off the field after their final game still alive for the postseason (both times, a game later that day sealed their fate). Sunday, Steelers-Bengals and Ravens-Browns both kick off at 4:25 p.m.; the Steelers need a win plus a Cleveland win to extend their season.

4. Third-down success

If they score 25 Sunday, the Steelers will set a record for most points in a season (right now, it’s 436 in 2014). They rank fourth in the NFL in both yardage (407.3 per game) and points (27.5 per game) – and the advanced analytics like the Steelers’ offense, too: they are third in WDVOA, a respected all-encompassing metric from footballoutsiders.com.

So what’s been the best part of the Steelers’ offense? Is it third downs? They are fifth in the NFL in both third-down conversions and conversion percentage. According to ESPN, Ben Roethlisberger is sixth in the league in quarterback third-down success, helping the Steelers be the NFL’s fourth-best offense on third-and-medium (3-6 yards to go) and 10 th in third-and-long (seven-plus yards to go).

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here .

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at cadamski@tribweb.com or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.