ShareThis Page
Stimpmeter to help keep green speeds consistent for 116th U.S. Open at Oakmont |

Stimpmeter to help keep green speeds consistent for 116th U.S. Open at Oakmont

Kevin Gorman
| Saturday, June 11, 2016 5:15 p.m
Guy Wathen | Tribune-Review
Darin Bevard, director of championship agronomy for the USGA, demonstrates the use of a Stimpmeter on Friday, June 10, 2016 at Oakmont Country Club.
World’s best prepare for unforgiving Oakmont
For the U.S. Open at Oakmont Country Club, the lore is part of the allure. Historically, Oakmont has a reputation for having the fastest greens...

For the U.S. Open at Oakmont Country Club, the lore is part of the allure.

Historically, Oakmont has a reputation for having the fastest greens in golf, which leads to the tale of how their speed is measured for consistency.

An accomplished amateur golfer watched in awe as a Gene Sarazen putt rolled off the Oakmont greens at the 1935 U.S. Open, where the winning score by Sam Parks Jr. was 11-over-par 299.

Edward S. Stimpson, the Harvard team captain and 1935 Massachusetts amateur champion, was convinced the greens were playing unreasonably fast, so he developed a device to measure their speed.

The wooden instrument, shaped like a ruler, was donated to the USGA. It went largely unused until the mid-1970s, when it was modified and distributed to golf course superintendents in 1978.

“That’s the story,” Darin Bevard, USGA director of championship agronomy, said with a laugh.

The Stimpmeter, as it is now known, is as simple as its story but has better accuracy measuring green speed than most golfers do putting on them. Twice modified by the USGA, the device now is an extruded aluminum bar that is 36 inches long, has a V-shaped groove on both sides at an angle of 145 degrees and a half-inch apart.

Bevard and two teams of agronomists, one on the front nine and the other on the back nine, will use Stimpmeters to measure Oakmont’s greens twice a day this week during championship play for the 116th U.S. Open.

The process is as fast as the greens are expected to play: When the Stimpmeter is raised to an angle of approximately 20 degrees with the putting surface, a ball is rolled down from a 30-inch marker. This is done with three different balls, using a tee to trace the distance from their starting point to where they come to rest. All three balls should come to rest not more than eight feet apart, and their average distance is the Stimpmeter reading. (On smaller, contoured greens, a 2X marking measures a ball rolled from 14 inches).

It takes all of five minutes per green.

“They’ll each do their own nine. I’ll do some checks for comparison,” Bevard said. “During advance week, we spend a lot of time Stimping side by side, just to be sure we’re using the same technique and that our numbers translate very well from one guy to the next.

“Generally, we would like to have the speeds at or close to whatever speed the USGA wants. Our course set-up team decides what the speed is. It’s our job to try to get them there and don’t exceed that. Ideally, there is a slow increase in speeds and by the Tuesday practice rounds, weather permitting, we have championship speeds.”

Where 10 12 feet is considered a fast Stimpmeter reading, Oakmont typically plays at 13-15 feet. The U.S. Open has a well-earned reputation for its insidious green speeds that make putting a rather diabolical deed, which means Oakmont should play more treacherous than usual.

“I definitely remember the golf course being really challenging,” said Peter Malnati, who caddied for a college teammate in the 2007 U.S. Open at Oakmont and tried to qualify this year. “I mean, the greens were what everyone said they would be. They were fast and challenging and firm.”

Bevard said Oakmont’s spacious greens, which average 8,000 square feet, will make sure the surface is speedy but that the USGA is careful to monitor the speeds so they can stay at a playable range.

“Oakmont will be some of the fastest greens you will ever have for the U.S. Open,” Bevard said. “The Stimpmeter is certainly important from a championship perspective, really, because you want to challenge the players with the speed of the greens, but you don’t want to get to a point where the speed of the greens becomes the story instead of the play.”

That was the case at The Players Championship last month at TPC Sawgrass in Ponte Vedra Beach, Fla., when third-round scores skyrocketed as the Stimpmeter reading reached 14.

PGA officials blamed it on high winds and humidity, but players grumbled that the course was manipulated after playing too easy for the first 36 holes. Four times as many golfers shot 78 or worse than the half-dozen who broke par.

The USGA hopes the Stimpmeter takes a backseat at Oakmont when it comes to talk of the golf course.

“If it’s a conversation piece, I hope it’s in a positive light,” Bevard said. “It’s not uncommon for the players to say, ‘Hey, the greens were fast, but they were really good.’

“That’s why we focus on ranges in terms of speed, instead of exact numbers. There’s a little bit of variability there. Folks get caught up in the numbers when what we’re really after is consistency.”

Staff writer Andrew Erickson contributed to this story. Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review sports columnist. You can contact Kevin by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: Golf
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.